지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A 1:1 correction is different from paper or group correction, in order to maximize the efficiency of correction instruction to match a professor with a student within short period of time.
This is to initiate the inquiry technique of correction through questions and suggest the teaching and learning model among proper and effective teaching methodologies. Its purpose is to improve the learner’s writing ability, as has not yet been proposed in a 1:1 correction instruction.
In the correction, the inquiry through questions facilitate teachers and learners’ interaction, easily determines the learner’s factor, can correct and modify content leading by learners, and is able to improve learners’ thinking skills.
This research suggests the procedure of counsel correction and the application plan of inquiry. Firstly, it presents the steps of ‘counsel before correction’ and ‘major correction (checking → summary of the correction result → understanding needs → correcting instruction → final check). On the application plan of inquiry, it develops the inquiry by writing types(problem solving type, book review, resume) and suggests the teaching methodology for effective correction by descriptive inquiry, multiple choice inquiry, and true and false inquiry. Moreover, the problem solving type of writing is exemplified through the specific teaching and learning plan.
This is to initiate the inquiry technique of correction through questions and suggest the teaching and learning model among proper and effective teaching methodologies. Its purpose is to improve the learner’s writing ability, as has not yet been proposed in a 1:1 correction instruction.
In the correction, the inquiry through questions facilitate teachers and learners’ interaction, easily determines the learner’s factor, can correct and modify content leading by learners, and is able to improve learners’ thinking skills.
This research suggests the procedure of counsel correction and the application plan of inquiry. Firstly, it presents the steps of ‘counsel before correction’ and ‘major correction (checking → summary of the correction result → understanding needs → correcting instruction → final check). On the application plan of inquiry, it develops the inquiry by writing types(problem solving type, book review, resume) and suggests the teaching methodology for effective correction by descriptive inquiry, multiple choice inquiry, and true and false inquiry. Moreover, the problem solving type of writing is exemplified through the specific teaching and learning plan.
목차
1. 서론
2. 첨삭과 발문의 의의
3. 첨삭의 절차와 발문의 활용 방안
4. 발문을 이용한 첨삭 지도 사례
5. 결론
참고문헌
［Abstract］
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김남미 / 2012 / 대학 학습자 글쓰기의 첨삭지도 방안 / 우리말연구 (30) : 269 ~ 296
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 나은미 / 2009 / 대학 글쓰기에서의 첨삭 프로그램 현황과 개선 방안 / 한성어문학 28 : 187 ~ 216
4. [학술대회논문] - 남경란 / 2012 / 주장이 드러나는 논문의 S 라인 / 대구가톨릭대 다문화교육원 워크숍자료 : 1 ~ 4
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박상민 / 2011 / 첨삭지도에 대한 학습자 요구분석과 효율적인 첨삭지도 방법 / 작문연구 (13) : 350 ~ 380
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 선주원 / 2003 / 질문하기 전략을 통한 문학 교수학습 과정 연구 / 국어교육학연구 (18) : 255 ~ 288
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 나은미 / 2009 / 대학 글쓰기에서의 첨삭 프로그램 현황과 개선 방안 / 한성어문학 28 : 187 ~ 216
4. [학술대회논문] - 남경란 / 2012 / 주장이 드러나는 논문의 S 라인 / 대구가톨릭대 다문화교육원 워크숍자료 : 1 ~ 4
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박상민 / 2011 / 첨삭지도에 대한 학습자 요구분석과 효율적인 첨삭지도 방법 / 작문연구 (13) : 350 ~ 380
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 선주원 / 2003 / 질문하기 전략을 통한 문학 교수학습 과정 연구 / 국어교육학연구 (18) : 255 ~ 288
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-003347334