메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박진빈 (경희대학교)
저널정보
도시사학회 도시연구 도시연구 : 역사·사회·문화 제2호
발행연도
2009.12
수록면
85 - 106 (22page)
DOI
10.22345/kjuh.2009.12.2.85

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The international exposition has two main functions. The first is to show the progress of industries and new technologies, and the second is to reveal the power and pride of the hosting nation. Evaluating the 1876 Philadelphia Centennial Exposition, one may add one more purpose of the event: to create or to prove certain aspects of the city the event is held. This paper argues that Philadelphia tried to redetermine its identity as the first capital city of the republic by holding this internationally acclaimed event.
First, the city tried to reestablish the history of American Revolution and Philadelphia’s role in it. For exhibition at the cite of the Centennial Exposition, historical artifacts of the revolution were rediscovered and the heroic stories were retold. Second, the Philadelphians reclaimed its status as the first capital and a booming industrial town by showing the representative manufacturers of the region. Its renown had already faded away as the new metropolis like Chicago took over the position of the leading industrial city. Therefore, Philadelphia used the occasion of the centennial as a chance to recover her losing fame.
Though the city argued that Philadelphia was the center of the revolution and the Exposition proved its historical importance, the event also revealed the ironies and conflicts embedded in the city. Contrary to the revolutionary spirit of liberty and democracy, certain groups of people were under-represented at the centennial. Blacks and women asked the true meaning of the constitution and wanted more participation in preparation and execution of the exposition, but their demands were easily dismissed.
Philadelphia’s effort to reinforce its historical importance continued through the city planning of the early 20th century and the construction of the National Constitution Center in 2003. These self-presentation schemes yielded some fruits, but also expressed clashes of various interests and contradictions residing in the city.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 독립운동사의 재정립
Ⅲ. 기술과 진보
Ⅳ. 시민의 권리에 대한 질문
Ⅴ. 박람회의 유산 : 도시계획과 기념사업
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-330-002533562