지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 도시사학회 도시연구 도시연구 : 역사·사회·문화 제3호
- 발행연도
- 2010.6
- 수록면
- 7 - 40 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.22345/kjuh.2010.6.3.7
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The fourth provision of the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity(Treaty of Ganghwa)>, established in February, 1876, and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> agreed in the following January changed ‘Waegwan’ into Japanese ‘concession’.
The admittance of the Chosun Dynasty to found the Japanese ‘concession’ was explainable, since ‘Waegwan’, from the end of the Chosun Dynasty, has been a specialized district where trade and diplomatic affairs between the Dynasty and the Tsushima Han took place. Waegwan, although first established in the fifteenth-century, had been in an unstable state until sometime after the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592, when the national relationship between the two was recovered: it then was reestablished in the beginning of 1678 and became the centrepoint of their interrelationship. The Chosun Dynasty successfully maximized the utility of the district by guarding and restricting the officials from Tsushima Han and the Japanese overseas’ traders.
When one scrutinizes and compares the idea and the policy of the two countries about the ‘concession’, it could be detected that Chosun had taken i t as a revival of an ol d tradition, but Japan had had a modern concept for it. The negotiations made in the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity> and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> well demonstrate the difference. Through these contracts, Chosun tried to limit the Japanese merchants within the restricted area as before, but Japan acquired advantageous trade policies in the whole Dongraebu, by convincing the Chosun government or making use of its ignorance.
After the establishment, Pusan concession developed into an ‘Japanese town’ which one could almost call a Japanese district. It became a Japanese trade and residential area, where the Japanese could manage and develop the estate, and even self-govern. However, a large Japanese population in the area was still from Tsushima, for only those from Tsushima could trade in the old Choryanghang concession, and the same people continued to cross the sea after the reform. They worked as commission agents of big merchants, the long enterprise with Chosun merchants from the period of the old concession. It seems clear that despite the modern characteristics of the new Choryanghang concession, it still contained pre-modern features of the old times.
The admittance of the Chosun Dynasty to found the Japanese ‘concession’ was explainable, since ‘Waegwan’, from the end of the Chosun Dynasty, has been a specialized district where trade and diplomatic affairs between the Dynasty and the Tsushima Han took place. Waegwan, although first established in the fifteenth-century, had been in an unstable state until sometime after the Japanese invasion of Korea in 1592, when the national relationship between the two was recovered: it then was reestablished in the beginning of 1678 and became the centrepoint of their interrelationship. The Chosun Dynasty successfully maximized the utility of the district by guarding and restricting the officials from Tsushima Han and the Japanese overseas’ traders.
When one scrutinizes and compares the idea and the policy of the two countries about the ‘concession’, it could be detected that Chosun had taken i t as a revival of an ol d tradition, but Japan had had a modern concept for it. The negotiations made in the <Japanese-Korea Treaty of Amity> and the <Lease contract of the concession in Pusan Port> well demonstrate the difference. Through these contracts, Chosun tried to limit the Japanese merchants within the restricted area as before, but Japan acquired advantageous trade policies in the whole Dongraebu, by convincing the Chosun government or making use of its ignorance.
After the establishment, Pusan concession developed into an ‘Japanese town’ which one could almost call a Japanese district. It became a Japanese trade and residential area, where the Japanese could manage and develop the estate, and even self-govern. However, a large Japanese population in the area was still from Tsushima, for only those from Tsushima could trade in the old Choryanghang concession, and the same people continued to cross the sea after the reform. They worked as commission agents of big merchants, the long enterprise with Chosun merchants from the period of the old concession. It seems clear that despite the modern characteristics of the new Choryanghang concession, it still contained pre-modern features of the old times.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 거류지에 대한 양국의 인식과 정책
Ⅲ. 거류지 형성과 초기 주민구성
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
‘租界’와 ‘居留地’ 사이 : 개항장 부산의 일본인 거주지를 둘러싼 조선과 일본의 입장 차이와 의미
한일관계사연구
2018 .11
-
양보와 조건
담화와인지
2007 .04
-
Japanese Studies in Korea
Korea Journal
1965 .06
-
개항장 공간의 조직과 근대성의 표상
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .05
-
재조일본인의 추이와 존재형태 : 수량적 검토를 중심으로
역사교육
2013 .03
-
19세기 후반 재부일본인사회의 구조변화와 쓰시마인(對馬人)의 대응
해항도시문화교섭학
2014 .04
-
조선의 기근과 일본쌀 수입 시도(1814~15년)
한국민족문화
2008 .04
-
해항도시 부산의 일본인지역사회 형성과 종교 : 지역과 국가의 관점에서 본 불교와 신사
해항도시문화교섭학
2014 .10
-
A Study on British Mining Concessions in the Late Chosŏn Dynasty
Korea Journal
1984 .04
-
Japanese Trade in Environmental Goods
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016 .04
-
Changes in Foreigners’ Settlement Space in Seoul, Korea, 1882 to 1910: Focusing on Chinese and Japanese Demographic Changes and Commercial Activities
Korea Journal
2019 .12
-
韓国大学生が関心を持つ日本の「文化」
日本語敎育
2019 .01
-
1910~20년대 상해 한인과 조계 공간
역사학보
2015 .12
-
경성제대 예과 학생들의 1930년대 ‘조선(朝鮮)’상 연구 : 일본어잡지 『청량』의 소설을 중심으로
일본문화연구
2017 .04
-
황국신민 양성을 위한 역사교육― 1944년 조선총독부편찬 『初等國史』를 중심으로 ―
日本語敎育
2017 .01
-
마쓰모토 세이초[松本清張] 연구 : 한국관련 작품을 중심으로
일본문화학보
2018 .11
-
조선 전기 부산과 대마도의 관계
역사와경계
2010 .03
-
제2차 조선교육령 시기 日鮮共學 정책과 조선인의 반응
역사와 담론
2007 .12
-
日本語 高母音[i][u]의 無聲化 條件에 대한 一考察
일본연구
2000 .02
-
조선전기 왜관의 설치와 기능
인문과학연구
2012 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
개항 이후 부산의 일본거류지 사회와 일본인 자치기구의 활동
김승
지방사와 지방문화
2012
.05
개항 후 초량 사람들과 근대 공간의 형성
양흥숙
한국민족문화
2012
.08
부산의 일본인거류지 형성과정 - 1876년 개항에서 1910년 국권 침탈까지 - ( The formative process of japanese concession in busan - from 1876 to 1910 - )
송혜영
,
우동선
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2001
.04
일제시기 일본군의 방어체계와 부산의 요새
김윤미
군사
2012
.12
식민지 시대 도시문화를 이해하기 위한 새로운 방식의 타자 읽기 : 김승, 《근대 부산의 일본인사회와 문화변용》(선인, 2014.4)
홍순권
도시연구
2014
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-330-003550843