지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.11
- 수록면
- 1,944 - 1,948 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It should be a key factor to maintain enough space between the headliner back surface and body steel structure in order to meet the requirement of FMVSS201 S6, which assesses head injury by impacting Free Motion Headform (FMH) to upper interior parts. The factor, however, is not practical solution in vehicle development because it conflicts with customer’s needs that require roomy interior space. Meanwhile it is highly demanded to reduce the gap between headliner and body structure as vehicle development is repeated. It is getting more important to adopt a proper countermeasure which warrants performance under the unfavorable condition in FMVSS201 standpoint. The understanding of the energy absorbing characteristic for each kind of countermeasures would be a stepping stone to choose proper one. So this paper highlights merits and demerits of widely used countermeasures in the aspect of raw material, manufacturing process and cost as well as energy absorbing characteristic based on quasi-static component tests. The characteristic is also compared quantitatively by a parameter derived from the waveform efficiency. And FMVSS201 head injury performance is compared according to the type of countermeasure through FE analysis.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 에너지 흡수재의 종류
3. 실제 차량에서 에너지 흡수재 종류에 따른 Head Impact 성능 비교
4. 결론
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-556-000410913