지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.12
- 수록면
- 245 - 268 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.24285/CLER.2012.12.16.245
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Chinese modalities of possibility are represented by various means, as is the case in languages across the world. In particular, for the interest of the present research, they may involve the so-called ‘能愿’ modal verbs and the ‘V+ de(得)’ constructions. What is notable, however, is that in terms of deontic and epistemic modalities, there is a delicate division of labor among the members of the modal markers, i.e. ‘specialization’ (Hopper 1991). For instance, it has been argued that dynamic modality has been specialized by 能; deontic modality by 能 and 可以; and epistemic modality by 會(Tiee 1985). More intriguingly, the degree of progression of the grammaticalization processes among these members does not seem to correspond to the degree of abstractness of the semantico-functional designation of the markers concerned. For instance, the modal marker that supposedly underwent the grammaticalization process most extensively, i.e. 會, seems to have begun to acquire the function of a modality marker most recently among those members in the paradigm; whereas the one that has long undergone the grammaticalization process, i.e. 能, seems to remain in the dynamic and deontic domains(Li 2004). The mismatch between the grammaticalization depths and the degrees of abstractness seems to be rare and warrants an investigation. These modes of modality marking converge at certain conceptual level of grammatical coding strategies, and at the same time diverge at others, resulting in a division of labor. As is widely attested across languages, grammaticalization occurs among the modality markers, in which deontic modality markers develop into epistemic modality markers, an instance of ‘subjectification’ (Traugott & Konig 1991). This is no exception in modern Chinese. For instance, the use of ‘會’ for epistemic possibility/certainty of the speaker, rather than an ability with reference to the sentential subject.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가기
Ⅱ. 양상범주 ‘가능’의 의미와 통사적 실현 제 관찰
Ⅲ. 현대중국어 양상사(Modal)의 문법화 과정
Ⅳ. 현대중국어 양상사의 분업과 인식적 양상
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0