메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김기성 (건국대학교) 김진수 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제10권 제3호 (통권 제19호)
발행연도
2012.12
수록면
61 - 74 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Although local government and public/private enterprise are promoting establishment of U-city as a imminent problem in order to fulfill a demand of the local resident pursuing better quality of life, it is hardly vitalized; some of their execution of project have been proceeding yet, or sometimes part of services are excluded. because of financial status of local government, which financial support are not forthcoming for it.
Even though financial resources of U-city management center is operating under the user-pays principle(benefit principle), this has some limit, and this lead to the necessity to study about not only user-pays principle(benefit principle) but also causer-pays principle(Verursacherprinzip) and joint cost sharing(Gemeinlastprinzip). It is reasonable to think that U-service might be a benefit for local resident who live in that city than others, so plan for imposing charge for them is considerable. A research which deals with joint cost sharing, securing financial resources from pay service with development of optimal service that people want, user-pays principle and causer-pays principle is momentous issue for U-city management center.
Currently, local government bear the financial expense for U-city management center operating though, the survey conducted in this research shows that majority opinion pertaining to provision of operating resources thought that sharing the expense both local government and local residents is more pertinent. and more than half of response answered that it is because local residents are beneficiary of the U-city service. Also research demonstrates that suitable proportion of sharing the financial burden is 65.5% for local government and 34.5% for local residents each, and the lower age and salary groups want, the lower financial burden.

목차

Abstract
I. 서론
II. 이론적 배경
III. 통합운영센터 운영재원 조달 방안
IV. 재원조달에 대한 인식 분석
V. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-595-000554928