지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.11
- 수록면
- 25 - 49 (25page)
- DOI
- 10.15299/jk.2012.11.45.25
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to reconsider the theoretical characteristics what have been the theories of literature in Hakjikwang published in 1910’s. In many studies, it is supposed that those theories intended to acquire aesthetic autonomy. But it just doesn’t seem to accord with the history of Korean literature.
In fact, the literary mans in that time didn’t think that an individual and community are opposed to each other. Instead, they hopped to reconcile personality with publicity.
It is confirmed through their definition of literature that composed of emotion(情) and meaning(意). The literary mans such as Choi, Du-Seon and An, Whak actually didn’t recognize those as different thing but it must be together. And then, although a little difference, their recognition look similar to that one such as Shin, Chae-Ho or Lee, Kwang-Su who was typical literary man in the previous period.
In this sense, it would be fair to say that their theories has been changed into proper form for the new situation.
It is also confirmed in the cases of Choi, Seung-Gu and Kim, Eok who had more practical theory. These are recognized the importance of presonality most of all but also didn’t deny that of publicity.
For they considered that it is the practice that makes the value of literature. Therefore they rejected Art for Arts Sake temporarily.
In fact, the literary mans in that time didn’t think that an individual and community are opposed to each other. Instead, they hopped to reconcile personality with publicity.
It is confirmed through their definition of literature that composed of emotion(情) and meaning(意). The literary mans such as Choi, Du-Seon and An, Whak actually didn’t recognize those as different thing but it must be together. And then, although a little difference, their recognition look similar to that one such as Shin, Chae-Ho or Lee, Kwang-Su who was typical literary man in the previous period.
In this sense, it would be fair to say that their theories has been changed into proper form for the new situation.
It is also confirmed in the cases of Choi, Seung-Gu and Kim, Eok who had more practical theory. These are recognized the importance of presonality most of all but also didn’t deny that of publicity.
For they considered that it is the practice that makes the value of literature. Therefore they rejected Art for Arts Sake temporarily.
목차
<국문초록>
1. 들어가며
2. 문예의 본질, ‘情意’의 의미
3. 개성과 집단성의 조화를 지향하는 문예
4. 나오며
참고문헌
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1910년대 문명조선(文明朝鮮)의 진단과 전망 : 이광수의 『무정』을 중심으로
오영록
비평문학
2013
.09
[논문] '인간'과 '생명'에 관한 현대적 시학: 생명파의 시세계
김진희
한국근대문학연구
2001
.10
한국 근대 초기 낭만주의 시의 산문적 경향과 시적 이미지 : 연구노트
이성혁
한국시학회 학술대회 논문집
2016
.10
『1960년을 묻다』
천정환
,
권보드래
,
김항
외 1명
문화과학
2013
.06
1910년대 후반 기독교 담론의 형성과 '기독청년'의 탄생 : 동경 조선기독교청년회를 중심으로
김민섭
한국기독교와 역사
2013
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-905-000725410