지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper deals with the different behavior of {-ous} before {-ity}. {-ous} is deleted in some examples as shown in continuous-continuity. But it remains undeleted in some other cases as in the curious-curiosity pair. The earliest attempt to deal with this deviant behavior is made by Aronoff (1976), who introduces the term “truncative morphology” to explain the truncation of {-ous} before {-ity}. His basic assumption is that {-ous} is truncated when followed by {-ity}. The presence of {-ous}, in his explanation, is due to some exceptional clauses attached to the truncation rule. This approach, however, fails to produce the general picture of {-ous} deletion. This paper goes to the actual data to examine the reality of {-ous} deletion. The search with WordNavagator produces 2,620 words that end in {-ous} and 2,183 words that end in {-ity}. The cross checking and review of the data shows that in 85 words, {-ous} is present before {-ity} and it is deleted in 109 words. A closer examination of these data reveals that there are constraints that allow the presence of {-ous} in certain environments. Aronoff is correct in that {-ous} is basically deleted before {-ity}, but it is also shown that {-ous} stays to satisfy higher constraints. With the proposed ranking, [Parse-σ ≫ PU(stress) ≫ NoEmbedded(-ous)], this paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the presence and the absence of {-ous}. The basic idea is that {-ous} is deleted before {-ity}. But when the deletion results in more unfooted syllables or in moving the stress away from its original position and the presence can resolve these problems, {-ous} stays to satisfy higher demand on parsing or on stress uniformity. It is also noticed that there are apparent exceptions to this analysis. Nevertheless, this paper takes them into account and presents the explanation to the apparent exceptions without abandoning the analysis.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 자료관찰과 Aronoff의 분석
Ⅲ. 최적성이론 분석
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이용성 / 2003 / 접사 운율하위범주화제약과 강세배정에 관한 연구 / 언어과학 10 (2) : 93 ~ 114
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이용성 / 2012 / {-ity}와 {-ness}의 생산성 소고 / 언어과학 19 (3) : 87 ~ 107
3. [단행본] - Aronoff, M / 1976 / Word Formation in Generative Grammar / MIT Press
4. [단행본] - Aronoff, M. / 2005 / What is Morphology / BlackwellPublishing
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Aronoff, M. / 2002 / Restricting Suffix Combinations in German and English: Closing Suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraints / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20 : 451 ~ 490
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이용성 / 2012 / {-ity}와 {-ness}의 생산성 소고 / 언어과학 19 (3) : 87 ~ 107
3. [단행본] - Aronoff, M / 1976 / Word Formation in Generative Grammar / MIT Press
4. [단행본] - Aronoff, M. / 2005 / What is Morphology / BlackwellPublishing
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Aronoff, M. / 2002 / Restricting Suffix Combinations in German and English: Closing Suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraints / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20 : 451 ~ 490
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-840-000877613