지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 130 (130page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The SHift, a long-term rented public housing, provides moderate income households for affordable housing, whose size(59㎡, 84㎡, and 114㎡) is larger than other kind of public housing, at lower costs (less than 80% of fair market rental deposit) during 20 years. The goals of the SHift are to change paradigms from owning house to living house, and to improve the afford ability of households having less ability to purchase house in free market.
Despite of the goals of the policy, it has been argued that there are two main problems with the policy. First, there are no standards about eligibility for the public housing above 85㎡, so that it causes barriers for lower income households to get right to live. Secondly, the Shift policy has problems with management systems, such as illegal sub-letting resulting in speculative gains, ambiguous entities for maintaining, restrictive participations of renters in maintaining their home, and Funds for Special Repair.
We propose several solutions for these problems as follow.
First, the size of housing units needs to be limited 85㎡ and less, and eligibility for the SHift need to be based on level of income. Households below top 60% income level should be eligible to live in SHift housings converted from National Rental Housing. Those with top 40% to 60% income level need to be eligible to live in SHift housing that can be sold. Those with top 20% to 40% incom level need to be eligible live in SHift housing came from rebuilding project and reverse rental housing, and residents’ net income need to be limited by 200 billion Won.
Secondly, amount of deposit for the SHift housings must be determined by size of unit. The amount of deposit for SHift converted from National Rental Housing need to bo 50% of fair market deposit. In other types of SHift units, the deposit of the housings whose sizes are 60㎡ and less, 60㎡ to 85㎡ need to be 70% and 80% of fair market deposit, respectively.
Third, in order to encourage renters to participate in management of their housing complex, it is necessary to restrict illegal sub-letting more strictly and to survey real residents. In addition, It is necessary to revise The Executive Rule for Rental Housing to mandate residents comply with the survey over 2 times. In order to manage SHift housing complex more efficiently, it is necessary to build systems to encourage renters to participate in management.
Fourth, in the SHift housings that are managed by entrusted companies, circulative manager system can solve illegal sub-letting and neglect of duty on management services.
Firth, the border of extents of responsibilities on maintenance between SHift housing owners and tenants should be clarified. SHift converted from National Rental Housing for household below top 60% income level need not to build a new standard, but to accept existing rule for maintaining. However, SHift that can be sold and SHift came from rebuilding project and reverse rental housing whose relatively high income household live should apply the maintaining rule according to The Civil Law.
Finally, it is necessary to improve the way to fund and use for Fund for Long-term Repair and Maintenance. In the Shift Complex composed to rental housing and owned housing, because there are differences between the payment rates for Fund for Long-term Repair determined by Residents Council and those of Funds for Special Repair formulated by city government, the city government need to seek a way to change the Fund for Long-term Repair and Maintenance to national government fund.
Despite of the goals of the policy, it has been argued that there are two main problems with the policy. First, there are no standards about eligibility for the public housing above 85㎡, so that it causes barriers for lower income households to get right to live. Secondly, the Shift policy has problems with management systems, such as illegal sub-letting resulting in speculative gains, ambiguous entities for maintaining, restrictive participations of renters in maintaining their home, and Funds for Special Repair.
We propose several solutions for these problems as follow.
First, the size of housing units needs to be limited 85㎡ and less, and eligibility for the SHift need to be based on level of income. Households below top 60% income level should be eligible to live in SHift housings converted from National Rental Housing. Those with top 40% to 60% income level need to be eligible to live in SHift housing that can be sold. Those with top 20% to 40% incom level need to be eligible live in SHift housing came from rebuilding project and reverse rental housing, and residents’ net income need to be limited by 200 billion Won.
Secondly, amount of deposit for the SHift housings must be determined by size of unit. The amount of deposit for SHift converted from National Rental Housing need to bo 50% of fair market deposit. In other types of SHift units, the deposit of the housings whose sizes are 60㎡ and less, 60㎡ to 85㎡ need to be 70% and 80% of fair market deposit, respectively.
Third, in order to encourage renters to participate in management of their housing complex, it is necessary to restrict illegal sub-letting more strictly and to survey real residents. In addition, It is necessary to revise The Executive Rule for Rental Housing to mandate residents comply with the survey over 2 times. In order to manage SHift housing complex more efficiently, it is necessary to build systems to encourage renters to participate in management.
Fourth, in the SHift housings that are managed by entrusted companies, circulative manager system can solve illegal sub-letting and neglect of duty on management services.
Firth, the border of extents of responsibilities on maintenance between SHift housing owners and tenants should be clarified. SHift converted from National Rental Housing for household below top 60% income level need not to build a new standard, but to accept existing rule for maintaining. However, SHift that can be sold and SHift came from rebuilding project and reverse rental housing whose relatively high income household live should apply the maintaining rule according to The Civil Law.
Finally, it is necessary to improve the way to fund and use for Fund for Long-term Repair and Maintenance. In the Shift Complex composed to rental housing and owned housing, because there are differences between the payment rates for Fund for Long-term Repair determined by Residents Council and those of Funds for Special Repair formulated by city government, the city government need to seek a way to change the Fund for Long-term Repair and Maintenance to national government fund.
목차
[표지]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[제1장 연구개요]
1. 연구배경 및 목적
2. 연구방법 및 내용
[제2장 장기전세주택(SHift) 현황]
1. 제도 및 공급현황
2. 임대관리 현황
3. 주택관리 현황
[제3장 SHift 거주가구의 주거실태 및 가구특성 분석]
1. 조사체계
2. 사회ㆍ경제적 특성
3. 주거생활
4. 임대료 및 관리비
5. 거주계획 정책관련 사항
6. 요약 및 정책적 시사점
[제4장 SHift 입주자격기준 개선 및 정책수요 추정]
1. 입주자격기준 개선
2. 정책수요 추정
3. 소요재원 추정
[제5장 SHift관리 효율화 방안]
1. 적정 전세보증금
2. 임대관리 개선
3. 주택관리 개선
[제6장 요약 및 결론]
[참고문헌]
[부록]
설문지
[영문요약]
[요약 및 정책건의]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
장기전세주택 소득계층별 주택규모 결정요인에 관한 연구
한국지역개발학회지
2014 .06
-
장기전세주택이 아파트 매매가격에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
부동산학연구
2009 .01
-
2000년 이후 공공임대주택정책의 특징과 지속성 강화방안
국토연구
2007 .06
-
임대주택시장에 있어서 공공임대주택정책의 역할에 관한 연구 : 한국과 일본의 비교분석을 중심으로
주거환경
2012 .12
-
장기전세주택이 주변 전세가격에 미치는 영향
도시행정학보
2009 .08
-
서울시 국민임대주택과 50년공공임대주택 거주가구의 수요특성 비교분석
주택도시연구
2018 .04
-
수도권 전세가격의 상승요인에 관한 연구
부동산학연구
2014 .01
-
임대주택 리츠 개선방안 연구 : 사업성과 구조를 중심으로
주거환경
2013 .04
-
사회주택정책의 두 가지 쟁점에 대한 검토 : 공급 주체와 대상에 대해서
주택도시연구
2012 .12
-
가구 특성의 변화가 주택수요에 미치는 영향
주거환경
2012 .06
-
장기전세주택 수익적 타당성 분석
주택도시연구
2014 .06
-
서울시의 공공임대주택정책 목표와 발전 방향
주택도시연구
2019 .04
-
주택 스트레스의 측정과 진단
주택도시연구
2012 .12
-
부담 가능한 주거를 위한 국민임대주택사업의 정책과제
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .11
-
주택 임차가구의 임차유형별 주거만족 요인 실증분석 : 수도권 거주 공공임대와 일반임차 가구를 중심으로
주택도시연구
2016 .12
-
준공공임대주택사업의 조세제도 개선방안에 관한 연구
주거환경
2015 .09
-
Study on Differences between Legal Rental and Real Residence Periods through Analysis of Move-out Households in Public Rental Housing
분쟁해결연구
2014 .01
-
민간건설 공공임대주택 공급정책에 관한 연구 : 5년, 10년 임대주택을 중심으로
한국지역개발학회지
2009 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
장기전세주택이 주변 전세가격에 미치는 영향
임성은
,
상남규
,
오동훈
도시행정학보
2009
.08
공공의 주택공급유형 선호도조사 분석 연구 : 장기전세주택, 보금자리주택, 국민임대주택을 중심으로
임성은
한국도시행정학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2011
.02
은평구 장기전세주택 입주민의 주거만족도에 관한 연구
허용
,
홍형옥
,
이현정
한국주거학회 학술대회논문집
2011
.04
우리나라 공공임대주택의 성격과 서울시 장기전세주택 : Harloe와 Kemeny의 논의를 중심으로
김수현
한국사회정책
2010
.12
서울의 지역자활거버넌스 구조 연구 : 강남구와 광진구 사례
김준현
서울도시연구
2011
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-359-001096930