개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
First decade of 21th century was an important turning point in the historiography of the Taiping Rebellion in China. “Revolution-oriented” theory(혁명사론)" which was the basic paradigm in research on Chinese modern history became powerless, and scholars are searching for new perspectives and research methods. Some newly emerging trends are found as follows in Chinese academia of the history of the Taiping Rebellion since the year of 2000.
First of all, fundamentally doubting usefulness of the class struggle and class analysis theory, researchers criticized the traditional quoting method--presenting words of Marx or Sun Wen as grounds for their argument-- in favor of pure academic studies with “broadened perspectives”.
Second, researchers are energetically accepting the Western theories and studying methods as the new study paradigm. They introduced various theories such as Max Weber’s charisma, Michel Foucault’s discipline, recent theories of psychosociology, mentality, social movement, rumor, and the Western academic literatures about the Chinese society such as Philip Kuhn’s Hunan research. They also adopted the new method of analysis with new concepts such as “royal power vs divine authority”, “Confucianization”, “military aristocrats”, and “politics”.
Third, there happened fundamental criticisms about the historical status of the Taiping movement and its leader Hong Xiuquan: the Taipings were just a military regime, not a revolution nor a nation, holding back historical developments with great disasters for Chinese society and people; The Taiping Religion was nothing but an sectarian, unorthodox, evil one; Hong Xiuquan didn’t do any practical role in the early history of the Taipings and was extravagant, corrupt, cruel, and incompetent and triggered internal power struggle, so he have to take effective responsibility for the demise of the Taipings.
Fourth, a shift in generation among researchers is actively proceeding. Many researchers turned their attention to other fields and there are so many historical materials and research literatures, but new strong elder and younger scholars are appearing especially in the fields of religion, local administration, Northern Expedition, women, Heavenly Elder Brother’s descension, psycho-mentality research, symbol, and rumor.
Fifth, both traditional subjects(religion, institution, women, policy and its reality etc.) as well as new socio-historical subjects(village system, rumor, psychosociological attitude, population, disease, food etc.) became popular. With its inner genetic problems(shamanistic elements, roaming and predatory characteristic of the movement, problematic personality and composition of the leaders, limits of the land system, the status of women, capital city Tianjing’s unsafe administration, unfriendly relationship between local people and the Taiping army in the north), the Taiping regime is evaluated as being inferior to the Qing dynasty. It is due to the scarce of historical materials that regional studies are converged in Jiangnan and the Guangxi province, being with the impressive Huizhou case study.
First of all, fundamentally doubting usefulness of the class struggle and class analysis theory, researchers criticized the traditional quoting method--presenting words of Marx or Sun Wen as grounds for their argument-- in favor of pure academic studies with “broadened perspectives”.
Second, researchers are energetically accepting the Western theories and studying methods as the new study paradigm. They introduced various theories such as Max Weber’s charisma, Michel Foucault’s discipline, recent theories of psychosociology, mentality, social movement, rumor, and the Western academic literatures about the Chinese society such as Philip Kuhn’s Hunan research. They also adopted the new method of analysis with new concepts such as “royal power vs divine authority”, “Confucianization”, “military aristocrats”, and “politics”.
Third, there happened fundamental criticisms about the historical status of the Taiping movement and its leader Hong Xiuquan: the Taipings were just a military regime, not a revolution nor a nation, holding back historical developments with great disasters for Chinese society and people; The Taiping Religion was nothing but an sectarian, unorthodox, evil one; Hong Xiuquan didn’t do any practical role in the early history of the Taipings and was extravagant, corrupt, cruel, and incompetent and triggered internal power struggle, so he have to take effective responsibility for the demise of the Taipings.
Fourth, a shift in generation among researchers is actively proceeding. Many researchers turned their attention to other fields and there are so many historical materials and research literatures, but new strong elder and younger scholars are appearing especially in the fields of religion, local administration, Northern Expedition, women, Heavenly Elder Brother’s descension, psycho-mentality research, symbol, and rumor.
Fifth, both traditional subjects(religion, institution, women, policy and its reality etc.) as well as new socio-historical subjects(village system, rumor, psychosociological attitude, population, disease, food etc.) became popular. With its inner genetic problems(shamanistic elements, roaming and predatory characteristic of the movement, problematic personality and composition of the leaders, limits of the land system, the status of women, capital city Tianjing’s unsafe administration, unfriendly relationship between local people and the Taiping army in the north), the Taiping regime is evaluated as being inferior to the Qing dynasty. It is due to the scarce of historical materials that regional studies are converged in Jiangnan and the Guangxi province, being with the impressive Huizhou case study.
목차
1. 태평천국사의 진면목은 어디에?
2. 계급론적 해석과 전통적 글쓰기 방식의 비판
3. 태평천국운동의 성질과 시기구분에 대한 시각의 확장
4. 광서성의 사회구조(향촌, 토속신앙)의 중요성에 대한 재발견
5. 신앙과 개인, 집단에 대한 새로운 연구패러다임의 도입
6. 새로운 틀로 보는 태평천국 지방통치론
7. 제도의 실상들
8. 지역사, 인구, 질병에 대한 관심의 지속
9. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (311)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金誠贊 / 2001 / 太平天國 平均理念의 展開와 그 近代的 變貌--天朝田畝制度 平均論의 資政新篇에 대한 影響 / 東洋史學硏究 76
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金誠贊 / 1988 / 太平天國政權의 確立過程과 “安民”政策 / 東洋史學硏究 27
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金誠贊 / 2002 / 江蘇省에서의 太平天國의 鄕村政策과 鄕村社會의 對應--吳江縣 同里鎭의 事例를중심으로-- / 역사와경계 43
4. [단행본] - 매슬로 / 2009 / 에이브러햄 매슬로의 동기와 성격 / 21세기북스
5. [단행본] - 매슬로 / 2011 / 인간욕구를 경영하라 / 리더스북
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金誠贊 / 1988 / 太平天國政權의 確立過程과 “安民”政策 / 東洋史學硏究 27
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 金誠贊 / 2002 / 江蘇省에서의 太平天國의 鄕村政策과 鄕村社會의 對應--吳江縣 同里鎭의 事例를중심으로-- / 역사와경계 43
4. [단행본] - 매슬로 / 2009 / 에이브러햄 매슬로의 동기와 성격 / 21세기북스
5. [단행본] - 매슬로 / 2011 / 인간욕구를 경영하라 / 리더스북
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
19세기 중국 개신교가 홍수전과 태평천국운동에 끼친 영향
김석주
피어선 신학 논단
2013
.07
東王 楊秀淸의 天父觀 : 天京事變에의 一遠因
金誠贊
중국근현대사연구
2013
.09
중국 도시 人民公社 건설 시기 街道 공간의 국가와 사회, 1958-1965 : 北京의 사례를 중심으로
朴尙洙
중국근현대사연구
2015
.06
중국 동북지역 중일자본 기업의 경영 비교 : 奉天紡紗廠과 滿洲紡績株式會社를 중심으로
金志煥
중국근현대사연구
2015
.03
중국 동북의 대두가공업 同業組織과 滿鐵 : 1923년 ‘大連油坊聯合會’를 중심으로
孫承希
중국근현대사연구
2015
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-912-001124047