지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Primo Levi"s literary productions have been interpreted by many critics. However, these critics attempted to focus the meaning of his writings through the lens of his final act, as if the suicide serves as a master text that unlocks the meaning of all other meaning. Such teleological interpretations make us overlook the precious insight that Levi tried to transmit. Levi"s insightful massage is to comprehend and bear witness to Nazis" unutterably barbaric crime, instead of being outraged at it. For Levi, Nazis" cruelest crime is to make communication impossible, to prevent ethical use of languages. The lack of understanding result in constant conflicts among the prisoner of auschwitz and a rise in their animalistic and biological desires, and finally destroys all of their humanity. Therefore, communicability is necessary for the humane survival of a person and, humankind.
In this meaning, Levi says that his writings were born out of an absolute need for communicating his experience to his fellow human beings and to future generations. Levi thus gave his life after Auschwitz to find a concrete and practical way of communicating his experiences. Much violence in our society due to the lack of communication in our society. This is why Levi"s lifelong task is important. Both the victims and perpetrators of violence present in our society and run the risk of repeating the error of the past. Thus, unlike other critiques, this article aims to focus on how Levi lived rather than how he died, and on what he wrote, rather than the hypothetical contents of his suicide note.
In this meaning, Levi says that his writings were born out of an absolute need for communicating his experience to his fellow human beings and to future generations. Levi thus gave his life after Auschwitz to find a concrete and practical way of communicating his experiences. Much violence in our society due to the lack of communication in our society. This is why Levi"s lifelong task is important. Both the victims and perpetrators of violence present in our society and run the risk of repeating the error of the past. Thus, unlike other critiques, this article aims to focus on how Levi lived rather than how he died, and on what he wrote, rather than the hypothetical contents of his suicide note.
목차
Ⅰ. 프리모 레비의 자살과 그 너머의 문제
Ⅱ. 레비의 증언집과 소통의 방법론
Ⅲ. 라거의 기호체계와 현대적 바벨탑
Ⅳ. ‘알고 있지만 믿지 못하는 희생자’에서 알고 있는 ‘생존자’로의 변형
Ⅴ. 레비의 자살: 소통의 실패, 혹은 또 다른 메시지?
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
프리모 레비 : 기억을 기록하고 인간성을 가르치기
He
,
be
,
t Hi
외 2명
제노사이드연구
2007
.08
프리모 레비(Primo Levi)의 “회색지대”
김용우
역사와 담론
2007
.04
다크 투어리즘의 역사적 의미에 대한 지리학적 접근
강태욱
,
이영호
,
박다빛
외 1명
대한지리학회 학술대회논문집
2016
.06
SNS 독서 커뮤니티의 집단지성과 미메시스 실천에 관한 연구 : 벤야민의 미메시스와 레비의 집단지성을 중심으로
김지연
,
강진숙
한국방송학보
2015
.07
레위 사람 제사장직에 대한 말라기서의 변호
김지은
한국기독교신학논총
2004
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-802-001206916