지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes the oringins of Japan"s claim over Dokdo based on the theory of acquired terra nullius and theory of inherent territory, and analyzes why the claim is problematic. Furthermore, this paper points out the controversy of Japan"s later claim based on inherrent territory, after it faced limits regarding the former claim of acquired terra nullius. Japan"s claim over Dokdo based on the theory of acquired terra nullius originated during the Russo-Japanese War when Japan secretly seized Dokdo after realizing that it was a strategically important place. After facing limitations of its claim based on theory of acquired terra nullius, Japan later referred to the theory of inherent territory, which was merely a rhetoric claim which closely resembled Korea"s claim over Dokdo. Therefore, this paper points out that Japan"s claim over Dokdo by mixing two theories of acquired terra nullius and inherent territory is inconsistent.
목차
1. 서론
2. 무주지선점 이전의 독도인식
3. 무주지선점 이후의 독도인식
4. 결론
?考文?
Abstract
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-913-003252363