메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이광희 (울산대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第28 第8號
발행연도
2012.8
수록면
37 - 44 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The goal of this study was to figure out the academic achievements for transfer students in architectural education field. The detailed research objective was to investigate differences of GPA scores between the general students who entered the school with regular college entrance system (section KA) and the students who transferred into the school (section NA) after the year of 1995. The research tried to find out the differences of scholastic achievements between two sections with respect to the five fields of students performance criteria (SPC) such as communication, cultural issues, design, technology, and practice which were regulated by KAAB. The research selected all the 417 former architecture students who entered the school from 1995 to 2006 as research samples. Then, the research divided them into two groups with 313 students who entered the school before 2002 (group A) and 104 students who entered after 2002 (Group B). The reason why the year of 2002 was taken was the school of architecture at A University set up the 5-year architecture school system in the year in pursuit of KAAB accreditation. With detailed analyses, the research found group B had statistically higher GPA scores with 99% confidence interval compared with group A. And the research results revealed big differences of scholastic achievements between two sections in group B in the majority of courses. The regular students’ grades were more intricately correlated with one another courses compared to the transferred students’. Although design courses grades were much same between the two sections, section A students’ grades of cultural issues, structure, environmental control, and construction courses were much higher than those of section B students. However, section B students’ grades for computer courses were higher than those of section A. Except the computer course, no one course that section B students’ grades were higher was found at all.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 연구의 대상 및 변수 설정
3. 자료 분석
4. 분석 및 고찰
5. 결론 및 향후 연구과제
참고문헌

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-540-003337775