메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김선엽 (수원대학교)
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 52호
발행연도
2012.6
수록면
59 - 81 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Arrow, The Ultimate Weapon, was an unexpected big hit at the South Korean box office during 2011. Most of the media or criticisms dealing with the film tended to regard it as a genre film without suggesting any reasonable grounds, calling it an action film, historical film, blockbuster or a historical-action film and so on. But it seems more like a war film when you see it in the perspective of genre film conventions and character types. For it clearly shows specific features of a certain genre which have historically been established for a long time. Above all, many of the articles or criticisms take in as any other genre other than a war film simply because there is not enough war or battle scenes. According to some preceding studies about war film, they are not essential since they are common only in early classic models in Hollywood. Robert Eberwein insists that more significant features or characteristics of war film are close relationships with history, realism, nationalism, patriotism, individualism, etc… Realism here, is not the same concept as one as a basic film style. It is much more complicated since it implies contemporary trends or desires as well as an authenticity itself. An individual hero whose priority is definitely put on his own survival or personal goal rather than his nation or community has also been general and solidified since the 1960s. The narrative and action inspired mainly by hard mission-a younger sister captured by enemy forces should be saved safely-seem to underline the male protagonist’s personal aspect but the film ends with a scene supporting nationalism or patriotism as letting his sister and her husband eventually going back to their devastated homeland. Both of the main male characters also fit in the typical categories of Hollywood movies as well as the genre conventions. The Chinese general reflects “an older, experienced leader” type while his Korean opponent does a kind of “ladies man”-especially for his only blood, sister, in this case-displaying “social class difference” as a rebel’s son. So it can be said that it’s closer to war film rather than any other genre film.

목차

1. 들어가는 말
2. 장르 영화로서의 〈최종병기 활〉
3. 〈최종병기 활〉에서 나타나는 전쟁영화의 관습들
4. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-600-003578597