지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This Paper proposes the re-thinking on Kim, ki-rim’s poetics on totality. Kim, ki-rim’s poetics on totality shows the objective method of cognition of reality. The totality is concept that it alludes the permanent lack of perfect cognition of reality, not perfect thing.
In Kim, ki-rim’s critical essay, this dissertation show the fundamental doubt on ideology of community, so he isn’t belong anywhere. Kim, ki-rim knows that the reality is made up differently on the person’s sight. Kim, ki-rim is concerned method of cognition of reality, not cognition of reality.
He supposes Muse who is full and infinite everything, as the last basis on the reliability of doubt. He presents “happy Muse” in his critical essay, that is method of cognition of reality. And he emphasis on the ration.
Kim, ki-rim selects totality as concept of poetry in 1930’s. He insists line of totalism slanted by right and left in the same time. Totality is concept to be diversity and difference. This contention is due to method of cognition of reality, which is keet up diversity and difference.
In Kim, ki-rim’s critical essay, this dissertation show the fundamental doubt on ideology of community, so he isn’t belong anywhere. Kim, ki-rim knows that the reality is made up differently on the person’s sight. Kim, ki-rim is concerned method of cognition of reality, not cognition of reality.
He supposes Muse who is full and infinite everything, as the last basis on the reliability of doubt. He presents “happy Muse” in his critical essay, that is method of cognition of reality. And he emphasis on the ration.
Kim, ki-rim selects totality as concept of poetry in 1930’s. He insists line of totalism slanted by right and left in the same time. Totality is concept to be diversity and difference. This contention is due to method of cognition of reality, which is keet up diversity and difference.
목차
【국문초록】
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 특정한 문예사조의 현실 인식에 대한 근본적인 의심
Ⅲ. 의심에 대한 최종적인 근거와 이성의 활용
Ⅳ. 다양성과 차이를 지닌 전체
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (55)
참고문헌 신청
1. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1931 / ｢피에로｣의 독백-｢포에시｣에 대한 사색의 단편 / 조선일보, 1931.1.27
2. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1933 / 1933년 시단의 회고 / 조선일보, 1933.12.7~12.13
3. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1931 / 상아탑의 비극-｢싸포-｣에서 초현실파까지 / 동아일보, 1931.7.31
4. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1933 / 수첩 속에서… / 조선일보, 1933.8.9
5. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1931 / 시의 기술, 인식, 현실 등 제문제 / 조선일보, 1931.2.11～2.14
2. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1933 / 1933년 시단의 회고 / 조선일보, 1933.12.7~12.13
3. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1931 / 상아탑의 비극-｢싸포-｣에서 초현실파까지 / 동아일보, 1931.7.31
4. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1933 / 수첩 속에서… / 조선일보, 1933.8.9
5. [기타자료] - 김기림 / 1931 / 시의 기술, 인식, 현실 등 제문제 / 조선일보, 1931.2.11～2.14
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-810-002614981