지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to make a quantitative investigation into the impact of the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors on group cohesion and the satisfaction of group members in a bid to help determine what type of leadership style and profile Judo instructors should have. The subjects in this study were 278 players who were selected from a population that consisted of Judo players in Seoul and Gyeonggi province who joined Korea Judo Association. After a survey was conducted, the players who gave completed answer sheets were selected. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS PC+ Ver. 10.0 program in a way to serve the purpose of the study, and the findings of the study were as follows:
First, there was a positive correlation between the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors and group cohesion. Regarding the impact of leadership behavior style on group cohesion, leadership behavior style exerted a positive influence at the 1% level of significance on social cohesion at a personal(training, social support and reward) and collective(authority, training, social support and reward) level, and on task cohesion at a personal(democracy, social support and reward) and collective(democracy and social support) level.
Second, in terms of correlational relationship between the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors and the satisfaction of the group members, there was correlation among leadership behavior style, task reception and social interaction. The leadership behavior style had a positive impact at the 1% level of significance on their satisfaction with task reception (training and authority), social interaction(training and reward) and coach behaviors (training, democracy and reward).
Third, as for the correlation of the extent of the workout of the Judo players to group cohesion and satisfaction, there was a positive correlation among their extent of exercise, satisfaction and coach behaviors. In regard to the influence of the extent of exercise on group cohesion, social cohesion at a personal level was under the influence of exercise hours and career at the 1% level of significance, and workout hours and career had a positive impact at the 1% level of significance on personal and group cohesion. Concerning the impact of the extent of workout on satisfaction, satisfaction with task reception was positively affected by workout hours at the 1% level of significance, and satisfaction with social interaction was positively influenced at the 1% level of significance by workout career and hours. Their satisfaction with coach behaviors was under the positive influence of workout hours at the 1% level of significance.
First, there was a positive correlation between the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors and group cohesion. Regarding the impact of leadership behavior style on group cohesion, leadership behavior style exerted a positive influence at the 1% level of significance on social cohesion at a personal(training, social support and reward) and collective(authority, training, social support and reward) level, and on task cohesion at a personal(democracy, social support and reward) and collective(democracy and social support) level.
Second, in terms of correlational relationship between the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors and the satisfaction of the group members, there was correlation among leadership behavior style, task reception and social interaction. The leadership behavior style had a positive impact at the 1% level of significance on their satisfaction with task reception (training and authority), social interaction(training and reward) and coach behaviors (training, democracy and reward).
Third, as for the correlation of the extent of the workout of the Judo players to group cohesion and satisfaction, there was a positive correlation among their extent of exercise, satisfaction and coach behaviors. In regard to the influence of the extent of exercise on group cohesion, social cohesion at a personal level was under the influence of exercise hours and career at the 1% level of significance, and workout hours and career had a positive impact at the 1% level of significance on personal and group cohesion. Concerning the impact of the extent of workout on satisfaction, satisfaction with task reception was positively affected by workout hours at the 1% level of significance, and satisfaction with social interaction was positively influenced at the 1% level of significance by workout career and hours. Their satisfaction with coach behaviors was under the positive influence of workout hours at the 1% level of significance.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
Ⅲ. 연구의 결과
Ⅳ. 연구의 논의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
유도도장 지도자의 리더십유형이 고객만족과 재이용의사에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2012 .06
-
조정지도자의 리더십 행동유형과 성원만족도, 응집성 및 자신감과 관계
한국사회체육학회지
2010 .08
-
유도 지도자의 코칭 행동유형이 집단응집력 및 선수만족도에 미치는 영향
무도연구소지
2004 .12
-
프로축구지도자의 리더십유형이 집단응집력에 미치는 영향
한국여성체육학회지
2006 .12
-
태권도 코치의 리더십이 집단응집력에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2000 .08
-
핸드볼 팀의 리더십 행동과 집단 응집성 및 수행인지의 관계
한국사회체육학회지
2003 .11
-
휠체어농구 코치의 리더십 유형과 집단응집력의 관계
한국특수체육학회지
2002 .01
-
지체부자유 학생들의 체육수업 인식
한국특수체육학회지
2002 .01
-
한국 미국 스포츠 지도자의 행동유형이 선수 집단응집력에 미치는 영향 비교 분석
코칭능력개발지
2013 .09
-
지도자의 리더십행동 유형이 투기종목 선수들의 집단응집력에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2002 .08
-
조교사 리더십유형이 임파워먼트와 팀 응집력에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2020 .10
-
대학정구팀 지도자의 리더십유형에 따른 신뢰와 응집력의 관계
코칭능력개발지
2010 .12
-
육상지도자의 지도유형과 선수의 성숙도가 운동만족에 미치는 영향
한국사회체육학회지
2010 .08
-
청소년 축구지도자의 리더십과 선수의 스트레스 및 집단 응집력의 관계
한국사회체육학회지
2009 .08
-
유도지도자의 지도유형과 운동정서 및 집단응집력의 관계
대한무도학회지
2015 .01
-
장애인이 인식하는 체육지도자의 리더십행동유형이 운동참여만족에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2010 .05
-
유도선수가 선호하는 지도자의 LEADERSHIP 유형에 관한 연구
무도연구소지
2001 .12
-
중ㆍ고등학교 유도지도자의 지도행동유형이 지도효율성에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2009 .05
-
유도선수들의 운동열정이 기본적 심리욕구만족과 운동몰입에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2016 .06
-
유도지도자의 리더유형과 자기관리 및 경기력의 관계검증
대한무도학회지
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-698-002660196