메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이영택 (광혜병원) 양윤수 (한서병원) 이용직 (광혜병원) 고수종 (광혜병원)
저널정보
대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research 대한외과학회지 Vol.74 No.5
발행연도
2008.5
수록면
361 - 365 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The aim of this study was to detail clinical experiences with a new type of tension-free herniorrhaphy using the Prolene Hernia System (PHS) and analyze the system’s usefulness.
Methods: We reviewed 48 cases of herniorrhaphy using PHS and 45 cases of conventional herniorrhaphy retrospectively by reviewing the medical records of patients undergoing either procedure between January 2000 and February 2005.
Results: There was no significant difference in the operation time (P=0.054) or the length of hospital stay (P=0.138) between the groups. However, the need for analgesic therapy in the PHS group was less than in the control group (P=0.008). There were no serious postoperative complications, but wound complications occurred more often in the PHS group (6 seromas and 2 hematomas), and urinary retention occurred more frequently in the control group. The recurrence rate in the control group was 2.2% (1/45), but there were no recurrences in the PHS group for 46 months.
Conclusion: Herniorrhaphy using the PHS is safe and effective as conventional surgery. It can be carried out under local anesthesia more easily, and it is less painful than the conventional surgery. We suggest that the PHS be widely adopted as a method of tension-free herniorrhaphy.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-514-002693196