지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.2
- 수록면
- 109 - 114 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare three types of hernioplasty using a mesh: Lichtenstein, Mesh-plug and Prolene Hernia System.
Methods: From February 2002 to April 2007, we retrospectively studied the clinical outcome of 138 cases of adult inguinal hernia patients who had operations performed with the use of mesh. Three types of mesh operations were composed of Lichtenstein repair group (LR group; N=18), Mesh plug repair group (MR group; N=38) and Prolene hernia system group (PHS group; N=82). The Clinical features and outcomes of the three groups were compared by age, sex, operation time, lengths of hospital stay, numbers of post-operative intravenous analgesics, complications, and recurrence.
Results: Mean age of three groups was 50.2±20.7, 51.0±18.4 and 61.5±15.9 years for LR. MR, PHS groups, respectively. The PHS group was significantly older than other two groups (P=0.002). The sex, operation time and lengths of hospital stay were not significantly different among the three groups. Numbers of intravenous analgesics used after the operations were 1.7±1.2, 2.7±2.2, 3.3±2.0 in the LR, MR, PHS groups, respectively. A lesser amount of IV analgesics was injected into the LR group than the PHS group. Although some complications occurred such as wound infection, hematoma, dehiscence, testicular edema in the three groups, there were no significant differences among the three groups. There were no recurrences in all three groups.
Conclusion: We could not find any better outcome among the LR, MR and PHS groups.
Methods: From February 2002 to April 2007, we retrospectively studied the clinical outcome of 138 cases of adult inguinal hernia patients who had operations performed with the use of mesh. Three types of mesh operations were composed of Lichtenstein repair group (LR group; N=18), Mesh plug repair group (MR group; N=38) and Prolene hernia system group (PHS group; N=82). The Clinical features and outcomes of the three groups were compared by age, sex, operation time, lengths of hospital stay, numbers of post-operative intravenous analgesics, complications, and recurrence.
Results: Mean age of three groups was 50.2±20.7, 51.0±18.4 and 61.5±15.9 years for LR. MR, PHS groups, respectively. The PHS group was significantly older than other two groups (P=0.002). The sex, operation time and lengths of hospital stay were not significantly different among the three groups. Numbers of intravenous analgesics used after the operations were 1.7±1.2, 2.7±2.2, 3.3±2.0 in the LR, MR, PHS groups, respectively. A lesser amount of IV analgesics was injected into the LR group than the PHS group. Although some complications occurred such as wound infection, hematoma, dehiscence, testicular edema in the three groups, there were no significant differences among the three groups. There were no recurrences in all three groups.
Conclusion: We could not find any better outcome among the LR, MR and PHS groups.
목차
서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서혜부 및 대퇴부 탈장교정술 중 Lichtenstein교정술과 Prolene Hernia System (PHS)교정술의 비교
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2006 .07
-
성인 서혜부 탈장 473예 임상적 분석
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2008 .08
-
Prolene Hernia System을 이용한 성인 서혜부 탈장의 임상적 분석
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2010 .08
-
Prolene Hernia System을 이용한 탈장 교정술의 합병증 비교
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2009 .02
-
Lichtenstein식 무긴장성 서혜부탈장 교정술 : 한 외과 전문의의 7년간 경험
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2001 .12
-
성인 샅굴탈장에서 Bassini법과 Lichtenstein법 및 Mesh-Plug법의 비교 분석
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2004 .10
-
Outcome of the patients with chronic mesh infection following open inguinal hernia repair
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2013 .05
-
Bilayer Patch (Prolene Hernia System)를 이용한 Hernia Repair 120예 보고
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2006 .03
-
탈장교정술의 방법에 따른 재발 유형의 차이
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2009 .09
-
서혜부 탈장치료의 새로운 방법 : PROLENE Hernia System
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2003 .11
-
성인 서혜부 탈장에 대한 무긴장 탈장교정술의 임상경험
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
1999 .12
-
PROLENE Hernia System (PHS)을 이용한 제대탈장의 치료
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2003 .11
-
Prolene Hernia System을 이용한 새로운 무긴장 서혜부 탈장교정술의 초기 임상 경험
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2003 .11
-
All about The Mesh for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Lichtenstein vs PHS
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2013 .11
-
Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair and prolene hernia system for inguinal hernia; review of one surgeon’s experience
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2012 .01
-
PerFix® Plug을 이용한 무긴장 탈장교정술 추적보고
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2006 .11
-
Comparison of partially-absorbable lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernia repair : multicenter randomized study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2017 .12
-
성인의 서혜부 탈장
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
1991 .03
-
Prolene Hernia System을 이용한 무긴장 서혜부 탈장교정술의 임상 경험
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2008 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
76. 서혜부 탈장에 있어서 치료에 관한 연구
임원식
,
민영돈
,
정양수
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
1989
.11
서혜부 탈장 수술에서 Tisseel(fibrin sealant)를 이용한 mesh의 고정
정민
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2009
.11
복강경하 탈장 수술
박재갑
,
김희철
,
김선회
외 5명
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
1992
.11
Lichtenstein식 무긴장성 서혜부탈장 교정술 : 한 외과 전문의의 7년간 경험
우상열
,
조영중
,
이정안
외 3명
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2001
.12
성인 샅굴탈장에서 Bassini법과 Lichtenstein법 및 Mesh-Plug법의 비교 분석
양지현
,
박상수
,
윤진
외 1명
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2004
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-514-002688022