메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박광용 (가톨릭대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第213輯
발행연도
2012.3
수록면
3 - 24 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Joseon Dynasty during the 18th century was called the age of ‘Tang-pyeong’. This ‘Tang-pyeong’ period of the 18th can be explained by the slogan ‘from communication to unification’. This slogan was based on the cultural and ideological tradition of ‘respect for unification’. King Yeongjo tried to achieve the ultimate goal of Tang-pyeong through national enterprise. In contrast, King Jeongjo tried to attempt this same goal through Gyujanggak, an academic undertaking which envisioned the regional unification of Eastern Asia.
It was the slogan of the 18th Joseon that a nation was composed of the sum of the majority and minorities, noblemen and commoners, joined in purpose by a ‘Good king’. In the 32nd year of King Yeongjo (1756), traits such as scholarship, morality, and fidelity, were highly valued characteristics of the gentry. With this, a king tried to become familiar with his countrymen as a whole, embracing them impartially as his fellow men.
In the 18th century, it was the public consensus that the central government was more important that a rural village but at the same time, ‘male quarters’ or ‘a poetry and study party’ could reach the same consensus to be found in a common street, or a village inn. The public consensus was on the verge of changing toward public opinion.
‘Joseon-Jungwha’ was nationally institutionalized during the reign of King Sukjong’s 30th year (1704). It was after this that various theories appeared with regard to a system capable of achieving the larger goal of ‘respect for the unification’ theory. These changes were embodied as a new scholarship called ’Silhak’ of the late Joseon.
Joseon during the 18th century pursued important political changes by adopting ‘Tangpyeong’ rather than ‘Bung-dang’, and a ‘well-timed road’ rather than a ‘universal road’.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 새로운 정치 형태의 모색: ‘탕평’론 -‘소통’에서 ‘일통’으로
Ⅲ. 백성[民]에 대한 파악 방식의 변화: 대종과 소종, 대민과 소민이 성군과 함께 -‘대종-소종’론, ‘민오동포’론, ‘대동’론의 강화
Ⅳ. 공론(공론영역)의 변화-분기와, 새로운 공론(공론영역)의 대두
Ⅴ. 일통의 기준이었던 ‘조선중화’론과, 북학?서학론의 대두 -새로운 동아시아적(또는 세계적) 일통 국가의 모색 방향
Ⅵ. 마치는 말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-002849062