지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Mysticism seeks a transcendental meeting with God or an ultimate existence. This is connected to our senses and creativity, moreover a dimension deep within us beyond our intelligence. However, general Mysticism and Christian Mysticism are different etymologically and fundamentally. Mysticism in the general Mysticism has a meaning of "hidden" but the mystery is not the content of religious ritual. Rather the mystery is the religious ritual itself. In contrast, Christian Mysticism has its reasoning based on the concept of Holy Trinity. Also instead of using the term in Greek ways, Christian Mysticism have used its term in the viewpoint of understanding the difficult parts of the bible. Furthermore, it is used to develop Christian Sacraments and especially Holy Communion.
The difference between Mysticism of Greek Neo-Platonism and Christian Mysticism is whether or not there is a genuine religious experience. The religious experience of Neo-Platonism is restructured based on the result of meditation so it can not be called a genuine religious experience. Whereas there is an ineffable experience in Christianity, there is no such experience in Neo-Platonism. Moreover even in the apophatic method which is the practice and process of Mysticism, there is a difference.
Neo-Platonism uses the apophatic method dogmatically but within Christianity, the apophatic method is always used with the kataphatic method. The hierarchy used in Christian Mysticism appear as a symbol of a level of sanctification, thus as a level of holiness. Also, the core of Christian Mysticism is associated with the concept of Christian"s perfection which is being united with God. However, this union reflects Holiness. Therefore, from this we know that the core phenomenon of Christian Mysticism is linked to holiness.
The difference between Mysticism of Greek Neo-Platonism and Christian Mysticism is whether or not there is a genuine religious experience. The religious experience of Neo-Platonism is restructured based on the result of meditation so it can not be called a genuine religious experience. Whereas there is an ineffable experience in Christianity, there is no such experience in Neo-Platonism. Moreover even in the apophatic method which is the practice and process of Mysticism, there is a difference.
Neo-Platonism uses the apophatic method dogmatically but within Christianity, the apophatic method is always used with the kataphatic method. The hierarchy used in Christian Mysticism appear as a symbol of a level of sanctification, thus as a level of holiness. Also, the core of Christian Mysticism is associated with the concept of Christian"s perfection which is being united with God. However, this union reflects Holiness. Therefore, from this we know that the core phenomenon of Christian Mysticism is linked to holiness.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 신비주의와 기독교 신비주의
Ⅲ. 신플라톤 철학의 신비개념과 기독교 신비주의
Ⅳ. 기독교 신비주의의 나타난 거룩
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-230-002860158