지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The suggestion that the end of God"s Creation is "for the glory of God" has been broadly supported so far. But the words, "for the glory of God" as the end of God"s Creation was transformed from the end of man"s life for the "glory of God" in the 1st article of the Westminster Confession. It may be not wrong to say that the end of life of Man the creature should be the same as the end of the Creation of God the Creator. Nevertheless, the assertion that they should be the same is not unreasonable. According to the Genesis, Adam the creature committed sin of disobedience to God and he was banished from Eden. This event makes it hard to say that the omnipotent God"s creation was successful. Then, why is it that Christians mention the "glory of God" even though he was not so successful in accomplishing of the end of His creation? American theologian Jonathan Edwards asserts that the end of God"s Creation is the "glory of God" by using reasoning and citing the Bible in his book Concerning The End for Which God Created the World . If one intends to suggest the "glory of God" is the end of the omnipotent God"s Creation, there must be a huge presupposition here: the Creation by good God should be perfect without affliction on the creature. Also this question should be answered: Why have humankind had suffered from the original sin of Adam after being created? These questions should be reviewed in order to understand the "glory of God" properly in Edwards" book. For it is not allowed that the tribute of the "glory of God" is understood as meaningless words. The book has won best praises for the times. I have researched carefully Concerning The End for Which God Created the World. He endeavors to analyze the issues from multi-angles by using Bible and philosophical reasoning. This research on the book can be summarized as two: First is to criticize Edwards" view that the "glory of God" as the last end of God"s creation may not be the same as that of Jesus Christ"s ministry. Second, the book is proved as an unfinished work by Edwards, and that makes it hard to overestimate the theological value of his writings on the "glory of God" in the book. These two proofs functions as a guide to understand the difference between the biblical "glory of God" and the "glory of God" of Edwards.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. <하나님의 천지창조 목적>의 내용
Ⅲ. <하나님의 천지창조 목적>에서의 “하나님의 영광”에 대한 비판적 고찰
Ⅳ. 에드워즈의 <하나님의 천지창조 목적> 의 실체
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0