지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Japan and other East Asian states have never been able to issue their own views regarding the history disputes in the region because they have served the US-led cold war system as a cog, not a major actor. In this period, Japan turned a blind eye on the historical responsibility for the East Asian invasion, bandwagoning on the US anti-communist system inj East Asia. It was then irritating even for progressive intellectuals and political elites to mention the history of East Asia, which often leads them to a controversy over historical accountability of invasion. In addition, a rightist tendency of history prevails Japanese society as conservative Liberal Democratic Party assumes a dominant leadership for many decades. Then came Taquewuchi Yoshimi, who put forward an issue of Japanese East Asianism in an introspective way for the first time ever since the Pacific war. Based on the idea of separation of historical structure and phenomenon, he comes to terms with an intellectual project, which tries to divide Japanese East Asianism into two flows, an ideology of East Asian solidarity and an ideology of East Asian invasion. In so doing, he tries to rebuild Japanese national identity, which has gone missing since the defeat in the WW Ⅱ, and then transpose it with Asian principle. This author tries to address different interpretation on Taquewuchi’s Asian discourse, consulting some existing comments of his arguments.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 역사인식론: 구조와 현상의 분리
Ⅲ. 주체성 부재의 근대화에 대한 성찰
Ⅳ. 방법으로서의 아시아
Ⅴ. 분리 기획과 아시아의 원리 되찾기
Ⅵ. 사상의 불연속성과 불철저한 성찰
Ⅵ. 분리기획과 비판의 부재
참고문헌
abstracts
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-001692113