The Japanese Annexation of Korea as Viewed from the British and American Press : focus on The Times and The New York Times :focus on The Times and The New York Times

Kim Ji-hyung

The Japanese Annexation of Korea as Viewed from the British and American Press : focus on The Times and The New York Times

Recommendations

Search

Questions

Type: Academic journal

Author: Kim Ji-hyung (고려대학교)

Journal: Center for Korean History International Journal of Korean History Vol.16 No.2 KCI Accredited Journals SCOPUS

Published: 2011.8

Pages: 87 - 123 (37page)

Usage

📌

Topic

📖

Background

🔬

Method

🏆

Result

The Japanese Annexation of Korea as Viewed from the British and American Press : focus on The Times and The New York Times

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors

This study analyzes the contents and characteristics of the reports related to the Japanese annexation of Korea that appeared in the major newspapers in Great Britain and the United States, namely The Times and The New York Times, before and after the Japanese annexation of Korea in 1910. Both papers boast traditions of over 150 years and continue to be internationally influential dailies. At the time, these two entities, which were representative of the press in Great Britain and the United States, swayed public opinion in favor of imperialistic expansion.
In essence, the two newspapers came out in favor of the Japanese annexation of Korea. They reprinted the official position of the Japanese government regarding the annexation of Korea, namely that the chaos in Korea had made annexation inevitable, and reflected the imperialistic expansionist logic that annexation would help foster the development of Korea. This can be regarded as the moment at which the issue of independence used as the logic for Japan’s territorial encroachment in Korea reached the terminus known as the ‘inevitability of annexation.’
The two newspapers reported on the annexation of Korea from the standpoint of Western imperialism. They reported on the process of the annexation of Korea in a manner that cloaked the violence carried out by Japan in the name of pushing through the annexation treaty, and excluded the positions of the Korean people. The rise of ?iby?ng (righteous armies) and of the independence movement in Korea in opposition to the violence of Japanese imperialism was decried as ‘riots’ initiated by ‘malcontents.’
Although the two newspapers, in their capacity as Western papers representative of imperialist nations, by and large maintained the common position of accepting the inevitability of the ‘annexation of Korea,’ each adopted, in keeping with the positions of their respective governments, its own line of reasoning for this acceptance.

#The Times #The New York Times #Japanese annexation of Korea #trade tariffs #extraterritoriality #Anglo-Japanese Alliance #neutralization of the Manchurian Railway #press control #타임스 #뉴욕 타임스 #한국병합 #무역관세 #치외법권 #만주철도 중립화안 #언론통제

Introduction
British and U.S. Policies Toward Japan Prior to the Annexation of Korea
The Annexation of Korea as viewed from The Times
The Annexation of Korea as Viewed from The New York Times
Conclusion
〈Abstract〉
〈국문초록〉

References (0)

Add References

If the reference is being serviced by DBpia, please register through [Add Reference]

Related Authors

김지형

Affiliation 고려대학교

Fields Humanities > History Humanities > Linguistics and Literature > Korean Language and Literature

Articles 4 Usage 694

Frequently Viewed Together

The Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) : Japanese National Integration and Construction of the Korean “Other”

Kyu Hyun Kim International Journal of Korean History 2012 .02

Raising the Issue of ‘Modernity’ : ‘Colonial modernity’ theory as advanced by Japanese Korean Studies scholars and the background thereof

Mitsui Takashi International Journal of Korean History 2012 .08

The Development of the Discussions on Unification during the Early Post-Cold War Era : Competition and Coexistence between the Government and Nongovernment Sector

Kim Ji-hyung International Journal of Korean History 2012 .02

The Historiography of Korea in the United States

Leighanne Yuh International Journal of Korean History 2010 .08

Kaesŏng Uprising of 1893

Bae Hang-seob International Journal of Korean History 2010 .02

Comments(0)

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-001673139

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

Abstract· Keywords

AI Summary

Topic

Background

Method

Result

주요내용

Contents

References (0)

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)