지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.6
- 수록면
- 13 - 21 (9page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since 2002, Architecture Schools in Korea was changing long traditional architectural education system from 4 years generalized architectural engineering curriculum to 5 years professional architecture program. Until 2010, 76 architecture schools have changed their program to 5 years course which was focused to design studio education. It was a very rapid change and there was not much time develop their own system which could represent institutional identity, character of students and local environment. Korea joined as a regular member of Canberra Accord in 2010 and it is meaningful to compare Korean architecture program contents to another country education contents. US architecture programs were selected for this comparison study. The goals of this study are to create a comparable understanding the form of contents of Architectural Education in US and Korea and to verify the substantial equivalence of these systems.
To achieve above goals, three public institutes of each country were selected and analyzed with general information, history, resources, curriculum and the matrix of Student Performance Criteria for quantitative comparison. For qualitative comparison education context of programs were analyzed with program missions, the way of advising, professional connection and distribution of faculty loads.
To achieve above goals, three public institutes of each country were selected and analyzed with general information, history, resources, curriculum and the matrix of Student Performance Criteria for quantitative comparison. For qualitative comparison education context of programs were analyzed with program missions, the way of advising, professional connection and distribution of faculty loads.
목차
Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
2. PRECEDING STUDIES
3. COMPARISON OF PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURALEDUCATION ACCREDITATION SYSTEM
4. CURRICULUM ANALYSIS
5. STRUCTURE OF CURRICULUM
6. CONTEXT OF EDUCATION
7. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술대회논문] - Hetzel, Peter J / 2004 / Toward An Ideal Curriculum to Reform Architectural Education / Windsor Forum on Design Education
2. [보고서] - Steidl, Douglas L / 2008 / Report of The International Global Task Group
3. [기타자료] - RIBA / 2008 / NCARB Education Standard For Foreign Education and Licensing, RIBA-USA Board NCARB Education Standard / National Council of Architectural Registration Boards
4. [단행본] - NAAB / 2004 / Conditions for Accreditation, For Professional Degree Programs in Architecture, 2004 Edition / NAAB
5. [단행본] - KAAB / 2005 / Conditions & Procedures, For Professional Degree Programs in Architecture, 2005 Edition / KAAB
2. [보고서] - Steidl, Douglas L / 2008 / Report of The International Global Task Group
3. [기타자료] - RIBA / 2008 / NCARB Education Standard For Foreign Education and Licensing, RIBA-USA Board NCARB Education Standard / National Council of Architectural Registration Boards
4. [단행본] - NAAB / 2004 / Conditions for Accreditation, For Professional Degree Programs in Architecture, 2004 Edition / NAAB
5. [단행본] - KAAB / 2005 / Conditions & Procedures, For Professional Degree Programs in Architecture, 2005 Edition / KAAB
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
전문대학 전공심화과정의 운영방안에 관한 연구 : 설계전공의 교과과정을 중심으로
송준호
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2007
.06
창의적 교육과 놀이 중심의 유아시설에 관한 연구
이민정
,
김억
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2006
.10
“근대건축” 교육의 딜레마 : 예술적 창조, 과학적 프로그램, 규범과 유형의 사이에서
이상헌
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2007
.03
대학입학전형방식과 전형요소별 5년제 건축학 전문학위과정 학생의 학업성취도에 관한 연구
이준석
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2012
.01
개별지도와 발표수업방식을 중심으로 본 건축설계교육
구본덕
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2011
.01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-540-001264051