지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Polluter Pays Principle has appeared, for the first time, in the documents of OECD in 1972. In that documents, the principle was considered as an economic principle on the cost allocation that government is prohibited from paying the cost of pollution prevention and control to companies in the form of subsidies. Over time, the meaning of the Polluter Pays Principle has expanded as an legal principle that polluter should bear the cost of pollution prevention and clean up, the responsibility for damage resulted from pollution. Currently, the principle has been established as the cost allocation and liability rule caused by environmental pollution in the field of domestic and international environmental laws. Korea also regulates the Polluter Pays Principle in the Environmental Policy Act, article 7 and embodies the principle by the permissible emission charge, quasi-tax etc. in other individual environmental laws.
Because The Polluter Pays Principle in the legal area is applied to these various forms, the interpretation of meaning and scope is unclear. These ambiguities lead to a lot of problems in interpretation, especially when the principle is applied to civil liability. In addition, the Polluter Pays Principle emerged on the purpose of amending the defect of market while basically maintaining the free-market economy system. So the question presented is whether the principle contributes to the substantial reduction of environmental pollution. This question led to a new theory that reflects the value of the environment itself and a critique of the principle in the light of the concept of environmental justice. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the meaning of the Polluter Pays Principle and to discuss the principle"s future development direction by introducing the critical point of view associated with it.
Because The Polluter Pays Principle in the legal area is applied to these various forms, the interpretation of meaning and scope is unclear. These ambiguities lead to a lot of problems in interpretation, especially when the principle is applied to civil liability. In addition, the Polluter Pays Principle emerged on the purpose of amending the defect of market while basically maintaining the free-market economy system. So the question presented is whether the principle contributes to the substantial reduction of environmental pollution. This question led to a new theory that reflects the value of the environment itself and a critique of the principle in the light of the concept of environmental justice. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the meaning of the Polluter Pays Principle and to discuss the principle"s future development direction by introducing the critical point of view associated with it.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연혁 및 이론적 기초
Ⅲ. 입법례
Ⅳ. 오염원인자 부담 원칙의 의의 및 한계
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 박균성 / 2010 / 환경법 / 박영사
2. [단행본] - 최병두 / 2010 / 비판적 생태학과 환경정의 / 한울
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김홍균 / 2002 / 미국 종합환경대응책임법(CERCLA)상의 책임당사자와 토양환경보전법상의 오염원인자 / 환경법연구 24 (1)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤서성 / 1989 / 오염자부담원칙의 적용에 대한 고찰 / 환경법연구 10
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 채영근 / 2001 / 오염원인자부담원칙의 적용상의 어려움 -CERCLA상의 정화책임을 중심으로- / 환경법연구 23 (2)
2. [단행본] - 최병두 / 2010 / 비판적 생태학과 환경정의 / 한울
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김홍균 / 2002 / 미국 종합환경대응책임법(CERCLA)상의 책임당사자와 토양환경보전법상의 오염원인자 / 환경법연구 24 (1)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 윤서성 / 1989 / 오염자부담원칙의 적용에 대한 고찰 / 환경법연구 10
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 채영근 / 2001 / 오염원인자부담원칙의 적용상의 어려움 -CERCLA상의 정화책임을 중심으로- / 환경법연구 23 (2)
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-366-001238037