지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The number of real estate project financing (hereinafter, real estate PF) by Korean mutual savings banks (hereinafter, MS banks) has increased sharply since the mid 2000s. However, the considerable numbers of these real estate PFs by MS banks do not belong to the original concept of PF that is fundamentally long term and non-recourse financing. In numerous cases, MS banks have lent to developers in comparatively short-term basis in the early stage of construction, depending on the payment guarantees offered by the constructors. Such a loan is called as a bridge loan which is expected to exist until the offer of main loan is made.
This paper analyzes why most MS banks joined herd behavior phenomenon in real estate PF despite of its high risk. Analysis shows complex reasons such as the concentrated ownership structure of MS banks, insufficient stable profit source, high debt ratio and high cash retention rate, difficulty of monitoring by minority shareholders in non-public MS banks, lack of monitoring incentive of deposit creditors, and so on.
Based on the aforementioned analysis, some policies are suggested as follows: First, MS banks should develop their assessing ability to estimate the business value of potential borrowers’ projects. Moreover, they must lower their high debt ratio to heighten their franchise value. They also need to resort to adequate regulation to control the entry of competitors. To prevent the preference of risky asset by controlling shareholders, MS banks had better offer their stocks to the public. Lastly, the supervising authority must handle real estate recession in a conservative and anticipative manner.
This paper analyzes why most MS banks joined herd behavior phenomenon in real estate PF despite of its high risk. Analysis shows complex reasons such as the concentrated ownership structure of MS banks, insufficient stable profit source, high debt ratio and high cash retention rate, difficulty of monitoring by minority shareholders in non-public MS banks, lack of monitoring incentive of deposit creditors, and so on.
Based on the aforementioned analysis, some policies are suggested as follows: First, MS banks should develop their assessing ability to estimate the business value of potential borrowers’ projects. Moreover, they must lower their high debt ratio to heighten their franchise value. They also need to resort to adequate regulation to control the entry of competitors. To prevent the preference of risky asset by controlling shareholders, MS banks had better offer their stocks to the public. Lastly, the supervising authority must handle real estate recession in a conservative and anticipative manner.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 상호저축은행의 부동산 PF 취급의 급증 및 부실화
Ⅲ. 부동산 PF 대출 쏠림 원인 분석 및 정책적 제안
Ⅳ. 맺음말
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
부동산 프로젝트파이낸싱 대출기관별 특성 분석
강태욱
,
이현석
국토연구
2008
.09
부동산 PF(Project Finance)대출의 부실화 요인에 관한 연구
김진
,
사공대창
국토계획
2009
.10
부동산PF에서 건설회사의 신용공여 완화 방안
이국형
,
방경식
,
문영기
주거환경
2012
.06
자금조달 수단으로서의 Crowdfunding에 관한 법적 연구
윤민섭
기업법연구
2012
.06
채무보증 가치를 고려한 프로젝트 파이낸싱 이자율 조정에 관한 연구
정영기
,
김경훈
,
김재준
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2012
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-366-001238017