지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ryuzo Torii and Masao Oka were the representative researchers who advocated the ethnogenetic theory of the Japanese race before and after World War II. Although both of them thought that the Japanese race was the mixture of various races from East Asia, comparative studies of their ideas have yet to be made. This paper aimed at comparing their theories from a viewpoint of the sociology of knowledge with a focus on their interaction with historical contexts such as scientific trend of thought and current foreign relations, etc. For a touchstone or a criterion, I focused on their choice between "migration" and "diffusion" as the moment of explanation of the genealogy, with the former being associated with the direct genealogical relationship, and the latter with the indirect genealogical relationship. Since Japan of the 1910s, in which Torii"s theory was announced, needed the logic which justifies assimilation of new territories, it was natural for Torii"s theory to be influenced by a viewpoint of migration. Torii came to realize, however, the importance of cultural studies made popular by the investigation of Miao tribes, and turned the direction of research into diffusion. Meanwhile, in the postwar Japan, which abandoned colonies, asked for a new identity as a homogeneous nation, Oka"s new theory was announced and Torii"s theory was increasingly seen as a dangerous ideology. Although the historical situation almost compelled genealogical studies of the Japanese race towards viewpoint of diffusion, Oka also commented on migration cautiously. Because of restrictions that the current social atmosphere imposed on each researcher, Torii had to give seemingly cursory comments on diffusion while concentrating on migration and Oka had to give seemingly cursory attention to migration while concentrating on diffusion. This study, however, argues that what two researchers aimed at was almost the same in the last instance. Although Oka denied any academic tie with Torii, it is not too much to say that Oka was a real succ essor of Torii.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 도리이설과 오카설의 개요
Ⅲ. 도리이설의 배경과 민족이동 개념
Ⅳ. 오카설의 배경과 문화전파 개념
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-001233181