메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김정규 (강원대학교) 양승민 (강원대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제20권 제5호 (자연과학편)
발행연도
2011.10
수록면
1,293 - 1,300 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Chester Step Test(CST), a sub-maximal test for the prediction of aerobic capacity, when compared to maximal oxygen consumption(VO<sub>2</sub>max) measured during a treadmill test. All participants completed VO<sub>2</sub>max treadmill test and on separate days, all of subjects completed the CST on two occasions(CST1 & CST2). Subjects were divided by two groups based on their VO<sub>2</sub>max level(High aerobic capacity Group; age; 21.2±2.45 yrs, Height; 176.6±1.12 cm, Weight; 74.5±2.34 kg, VO<sub>2</sub>max; 53.2±4.65 ml/kg/min; Low aerobic capacity Group; age; 21.5±3.88 yrs, Height; 176.8±2.45 cm, Weight; 78.4±4.77 kg, VO<sub>2</sub>max; 40.4±6.77 ml/kg/min). During CST, subjects were required to step on to and a off 30 cm step at a rate set by the metronome beat on a audio cassette. The initial step rate was 15 steps per minute and every 2 minutes the tempo increased by 5 steps per minutes. The subject continued stepping until he reached 80% of their maximum predicted heart rate, or reported a rating of perceived exertion of 15 on the Borg scale, or reached the end of 10-minutes 5 stage test.
There was a more higher correlation(r=0.805, p<.0001) between actual VO<sub>2</sub>max and CST in the low aerobic capacity group than high aerobic capacity group(r=0.634, p<.001). The test-retest repeatability of CST was showed to be good(Chonbach a =0.92).
In conclusion, the reliability of the CST as a field based test to detect improvements in aerobic fitness might be recommended. However, validity of CST to predict an actual VO<sub>2</sub>max is questionable in the high level of aerobic capacity group. Futhermore, it is unclear whether or not the current results are applicable to three other recommended step heights.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-692-001072616