메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강정원 (부산대학교)
저널정보
호서사학회 역사와 담론 역사와 담론 第59輯
발행연도
2011.8
수록면
69 - 113 (45page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article analyzes the Research Paper of Forest in Chang-Won County which is the original evaluation based on the researches of woodlands and the survey of each lot. It is to grasp the currents of the ownership of national forests and civil-owned-fields in Changwon and understand the ownership changes.
The Paper shows that the civil-owned national ratio(85% of the total lots and 67% of the total area) is far greater than the national(15% of the lots and 33% the area). The private ownership is greate importance in civil ownership(98.5% of the lots and 98.1% of the areas).
Changwon county’s national forests have some special features like this. First, the Yungorim(緣故林)of the Bulyojonrim(不要存林) holds the majority in the total nationals and most of their loans are alloted to the pro-government groups or to its townships. Second, there’s no the Yungorim of the Ipheaguanhang. Third, there are many forests which have military purpose in Jinhea and Chunga.
The civil-owned forests have some features too. Its share rosed slightly by the forest survey. It also shows that the town ownership has increased for securing its finance on the one hand and for getting the town located in colonial regime on the other.
The project has changed the ownership. First the national forests has increased by the way of reversing the Yun-Go-Rim to the national treasury. It was a result of the fact that the Gemynagsiljuck(禁養實積) was just alone applied as a criterion. There was no overall considering that could determine the right of the Yungorim being relevant to the occupations. Second the poor private ownership was created. That was the reason why the research made the management structure not based on the using rights but based on the ownerships. The group ownership like a family land(宗中) and gye(契) was also excluded. Because the project substituted the ownership of autonomous community for the joint-ownership the group ownership and the right of joint use were restricted or dismantled. Those policies individualized the ownership and promoted the small scale ownership widespread.

목차

1. 머리말
2.『임야조사서』의 구성과 내용
3.『임야조사서』에 나타난 소유현황
4. 창원군의 임야 소유구조 변화
5. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-911-000930488