메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject
Humanities
General Humanities History Philosophy Religious Studies Linguistics and Literature Other Humanities
Social science
General Social Science Business Management Tourism Education Military Science Library and Information Science Law Sociology Journalism and Media Studies Psychological Science Political Science and Diplomacy Geography Public Administration Economics International Trade Anthropology Other Social Science
Natural science
General Natural Science Physics Biology Life Sciences Mathematics/Statistics Astronomy Earth Science Chemistry Other Natural Science
Engineering
General Engineering Architectural Engineering Mechanical Engineering Industrial Engineering Material/Energy Engineering Electrical and Electronic Engineering Marine and Ocean Engineering Chemical Engineering Computer Science Other Engineering
Medical science
General Medical Science Nursing Science Veterinary Pharmacy Traditional Korean Medicine Basic Medicine Clinical Medicine Other Medicine
Agriculture and Fishery
General Agriculture and Fishery Agriculture Fishery Science Food Science Forestry Animal Husbandry Marine Transportation Studies Other Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
General Arts Design Fine Arts Cosmetology Photography Music Fashion Kinesiology Performing Media Arts Other Arts and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
Interdisciplinary Research Science and Technology Studies Brain and Cognitive Science Technology Policy Other Interdisciplinary Studies

KOR

美國 反트러스트法上의 反訴에 관한 一考察
Recommendations
Search
Questions

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Journal
Han Yang Law Association Han Yang Law Review Vol.10 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
1999.12
Pages
463 - 474 (12page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
美國 反트러스트法上의 反訴에 관한 一考察
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
No content found

Contents

Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 反트러스트法上의 反訴의 種類
Ⅲ. 셔먼法 第2條 違法行爲의 立證要件
Ⅳ. 反트러스트法上의 反訴에 있어서 考慮하여야 할 要因
Ⅴ. 結論

References (0)

Add References
If the reference is being serviced by DBpia, please register through [Add Reference]

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Section 2 of the Sherman Act in the United States and Article 102 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union : A Comparative Study
Sang Duk Kang The Justice 2012 .12
최근의 日本에 있어서 經濟刑法의 動向에 대하여
西田典之 ,  徐巨錫 Jeonbuk Law Review 2001 .12
定期船 同盟과 EU 獨占禁止法
宋聖淑 월간 해양수산 1995 .04
Requirements for Regulation by Competition Laws over Hold-up by Breach of FRAND Commitment
Lee Hwang The Justice 2012 .04
Antitmonopoly and Merger Regulation in the United States of America - A Study on Section 2 of the Sherman Act and on Section 7 of the Clayton Act -
Sung-Hae Cho The Jounal of Comparative Private Law 2002 .08

Recently viewed articles

Noise Measurement and Filtering Techniques in Acoustical Space
Jun Kim, Muhammad Imran, Jin Yong JeonKorean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering(KSNVE)2016.10
 An Exploratory Study on the Relationship between the Impact of the Retirement Age Extension Policy and Policy Acceptability: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Learning Competency
Choi Yena2023.03
 북한 이탈 여성에 대한 여성주의 목회상담적 이해: 생존의 모티브 하갈을 중심으로
구본경Korean Association of Women Theologians2022.12

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000826400