메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

A Comparative Study on the Korean-Japanese Broadcasting Legal System
Recommendations
Search
Questions

한·일 방송법제의 비교연구

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
In Seon Ham (전남대학교)
Journal
Korean Legal Center The Justice Vol.126 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2011.10
Pages
128 - 149 (22page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
A Comparative Study on the Korean-Japanese Broadcasting Legal System
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Nowadays there were amendments of Broadcasting-related Act both in Korea and Japan. These amendments aimed at responding to both the convergence of the broadcasting and telecommunications and the deregulation. Korea and Japan are playing the role of IT Superpower in the world. But, it is mainly hardware-oriented industry, whereas software is centered on the IT world. This Study is pursuing for the comparative research on the Broadcasting Act of both Korea and Japan, and whether its amendments were taken the balance between the hardware and software. For the purpose of it, this article is focused on the legislative intent, the definitions of the legal terms, regulatory agency, entry regulations, broadcasting program regulation. First, in the light of the legislative intent, the Japanese Broadcasting Act is lacking in the clause of the protection of the viewers' interests contrary to the Korean one. Second, in the light of the definitions of the legal terms, especially the concept of "broadcasting" is changed in the Japanese Broadcasting Act. The core point is from "through wireless telecommunication" to "through electric telecommunication". Third, in the light of regulatory agency, Japanese regulatory agency is The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC), whereas Korean is The Korea Communications Commission(KCC). Fourth, in the light of entry regulations, both Korea and Japan have made meaningful amendments from the viewpoint of the deregulation. Fifth, in the light of broadcasting program regulation, Japan is very much cautious not only in the academic but also in the Government, whereas Korea is active in broadcasting program regulation especially in the administrative bodies. And there is room for the violation of the Constitution in the execution of broadcasting program regulation.
In the conclusion, the implications of this study are presented in four ways. After all, in my conclusion, the Korean Act is required for the broader freedom of the broadcasting.

Contents

논문요지
Ⅰ. 본고의 문제인식과 구성
Ⅱ. 한·일 방송법제의 개관
Ⅲ. 한·일 방송법제의 비교 검토
Ⅳ. 결어 - 비교연구로부터의 시사점
<참고문헌>
Abstract

References (3)

Add References

Related precedents (1)

1 / 1
  • 헌법재판소 2008. 6. 26. 선고 2005헌마506 전원재판부

    가. 한국광고자율심의기구는 행정기관적 성격을 가진 방송위원회로부터 위탁을 받아 이 사건 텔레비전 방송광고 사전심의를 담당하고 있는바, 한국광고자율심의기구는 민간이 주도가 되어 설립된 기구이기는 하나, 그 구성에 행정권이 개입하고 있고, 행정법상 공무수탁사인으로서 그 위탁받은 업무에 관하여 국가의 지휘·감독을 받고 있으며, 방송위원회는 텔레비

    View more

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000763795