지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The mobile telecommunication service has been provided in Korea since 1980s. A handset for mobile phone service (“mobile phone”, “MP”) is indispensable for the provision of such service. The regulations regarding the radio communication has set the licensing regime for the MP since its beginning of the services. After the market development in late 1990, the licensing regime was deregulated such that the license for using the MP was deemed to be given through the service subscription contract between mobile telecom operators(“MTO”) and end-users. On the other hand the mobile telecommunication service has been regulated by the telecommunication business law, which specified the rules regarding the licensing regime for MTOs’ MP sales business, and its marketing.
Major terms and conditions in typical consignment sales contract between MTO and sales agent have been based upon such regulations, which has been modified several times from the beginning till today. The most notable feature of the sales contract lies in the transfer of ownership of MP. According to the contract terms, the MTO may assume the seller status of MP, whereas the agent is the buyer of MP. However, it is the MTO who is the seller of MP against the end-users in the mobile phone subscription contract. A sort of discrepancy is occurring in the context of identification about who is seller of MP.
Such discrepancy is invoking interpretation issues regarding the rules specified in the value added tax law(“VAT law”) which defines some conditions for the non-inclusion of tax base benefit. Non-inclusion of tax base may be accepted in case of the sales of goods the price of which are discounted between seller and buyer. The problem in this case lies in the contractual fact that the MTO is the seller against the sales agent, whereas the price discount is done through the provision of the monetary subsidy by the MTO in favor of end-users.
Major terms and conditions in typical consignment sales contract between MTO and sales agent have been based upon such regulations, which has been modified several times from the beginning till today. The most notable feature of the sales contract lies in the transfer of ownership of MP. According to the contract terms, the MTO may assume the seller status of MP, whereas the agent is the buyer of MP. However, it is the MTO who is the seller of MP against the end-users in the mobile phone subscription contract. A sort of discrepancy is occurring in the context of identification about who is seller of MP.
Such discrepancy is invoking interpretation issues regarding the rules specified in the value added tax law(“VAT law”) which defines some conditions for the non-inclusion of tax base benefit. Non-inclusion of tax base may be accepted in case of the sales of goods the price of which are discounted between seller and buyer. The problem in this case lies in the contractual fact that the MTO is the seller against the sales agent, whereas the price discount is done through the provision of the monetary subsidy by the MTO in favor of end-users.
목차
Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 단말기보조금의 의의
Ⅲ. 이동통신사업자의 단말기 유통제도
Ⅳ. 단말기 보조금 지급유형에 따른 법률관계
Ⅴ. 단말기 보조금과 부가가치세 과세표준 산정
Ⅵ. 결어
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
마일리지 결제 시 부가가치세법상 매출에누리의 인정 여부
공현진
,
박훈
조세법연구
2014
.08
단말기 보조금과 부가가치세법상 에누리 : 대법원 2015.12.13. 선고, 2013두19615 판결을 중심으로
안경봉
법학논총
2017
.02
마일리지 관련 거래와 부가가치세
강성모
조세법연구
2014
.11
출국세 도입에 대한 헌법적 검토와 입법 형태에 관한 연구
최정희
조세학술논집
2014
.10
독일의 기업분할세제에 관한 연구 : 영업분할(Betriebsaufspaltung)에 대한 과세를 중심으로
서보국
조세학술논집
2014
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-329-000382595