지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to find out the limit of self defense and the solution of competition.
It is impossible for us to admit self defense without limit in actuality of criminal law if we take adequate notice of the benefit and protection of the law, the principle of propriety, and the principle of present. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of competition of justifications and security of effectiveness about self help in the criminal law of Korea.
The results show that as follow:
Firstly, the question of whether or not to admit self defense, is determined by the special feature by means of advance emergency act. It is impossible to shirk one’s criminal responsibility about a revenge act.
Secondly, we must not only know the difference between self defense and self help in the criminal justifications, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the mutual supplementation which overcome weakness. This study shows how we will decide a standard of justifications between self defense and self help.
Thirdly, we have to make full use of the self help by justification in a judicial precedent, because the self help is a fort which protect a claim, especially property right, from violation.
It is impossible for us to admit self defense without limit in actuality of criminal law if we take adequate notice of the benefit and protection of the law, the principle of propriety, and the principle of present. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of competition of justifications and security of effectiveness about self help in the criminal law of Korea.
The results show that as follow:
Firstly, the question of whether or not to admit self defense, is determined by the special feature by means of advance emergency act. It is impossible to shirk one’s criminal responsibility about a revenge act.
Secondly, we must not only know the difference between self defense and self help in the criminal justifications, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the mutual supplementation which overcome weakness. This study shows how we will decide a standard of justifications between self defense and self help.
Thirdly, we have to make full use of the self help by justification in a judicial precedent, because the self help is a fort which protect a claim, especially property right, from violation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 정당방위의 몇 가지 문제점
Ⅲ. 형법 제23조 자구행위의 중요성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-000267958