메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
구지영 (한국해양대학교)
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제27집
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
15 - 39 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korean Chinese refer to those who moved from the Korean peninsula to the northeast area of China from late 19 century to early 20 century, and the people who have gathered in group as minority ethnics and their descendents in China during the establishment of northeast Asia as modern nation. Originally, Korean Chinese has maintained ethnic community with strong homogeneity while 90% or more of the population resided together in the northeast area of China. However, through political and economical modification of northeast Asia in the 1990s, mass immigration occurred to their homeland Korea and seaport city in China under development, so they are rapidly changing from ‘Local agricultural group’ anchoring in the place to an ‘Transnational civil group’ exceeding boundaries. Such existence of moving Korean Chinese became social issue in Korean and China, and is bringing up many debates related to their legal position such as ‘brother’ and ‘foreigner’, ‘legal’ and ‘illegal’, ‘recovery of nationality’ and ‘dual nationality’. The paper will review the movement of Korean Chinese and the change of their legal status in a contemporary view, and holds its purpose to consider how individuals interpretㆍutilize nationality through the case of families. Today, mutual reaction between the intangible ‘Transnational social space’, which formsㆍmaintains through movement over the boundaries of nations, and the tangible ’nation-state space’, which restricts movement within the territory, is becoming gradually complex. The nationality which this paper focuses on as ‘legal bond linking the nation and the people’ will be the keyword for showing such relation. In addition, individual interpretation and utilization regarding nationality will become an example which provides multi-meaning of nationality in the age of total globalization, that is, ‘nomadic vision’ which differs from ‘settler essentialism’.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 선행연구 검토 및 본고의 관점
Ⅲ. 국민국가 형성기의 이동과 국적
Ⅳ. 전지구화 시대의 이동과 국적
Ⅴ. 국적의 해석과 활용
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【논문초록】

참고문헌 (6)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-910-000267827