메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
문원립 (동국대학교)
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 48호
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
185 - 206 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Jane Roscoe and Craig Hight, in their seminal work Faking it: Mock Documentary and the subversion of factuality, regard mock documentary essentially as a parody. It must be, considering their central use of the word “mock”. But, the author argues, if mock documentaries are understood as “fictional texts which in some form look like documentaries”, they are not all parodies, at least not in the ordinary sense of the term.
Mock documentaries are supposed to use the “code and conventions” of documentaries, but the problem is that, as an author says, “no particular formal or thematic features exist that are the sole province of either ‘documentary’ or ‘fiction’”. Using the techniques like hand-held shots, interviews, narrations, etc. (so-called “conventions” of documentary) are not enough, and perhaps not even required, for a film to look like a documentary. What is essential in mock documentaries, in the author’s view, is that the pro-filmic event does not look like directed, that is, staged.
If we think of mock documentaries as films that imitate documentaries, it might seem obvious that they are parodies. But if we think of them instead as films that look un-staged, we can see that they are not by themselves parodies. A film can look un-staged (like a documentary), but one cannot parody an un-staged film (a documentary).

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 로스코와 하이트의 모크 다큐멘터리 이론
3. 모크 다큐멘터리는 패러디가 아니다
4. ‘관습’의 의미
5. 모크 다큐멘터리의 본질
6. 마치며
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-600-000423973