메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第118輯
발행연도
2011.6
수록면
165 - 195 (31page)

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Hong Yi-sup’s greatest accomplishment was to identify two specific moments in Chos?n Korea that could be seen as sparks of a modern scientific tradition, even though they had to be defined as some rare exceptions. One was the court’s investment in scientific and technological innovations during Sejong’s reign. The other was the culmination of Sirhak in the 18th century. Whereas before, Korean tradition had suffered wholesale labelling as backward and primitive, Hong demonstrated in his historiography that there was still redemption to be found. However, because Hong began his inquiry into history of Korean science by critiquing the larger Confucian climate that generated knowledge, these moments of scientific discovery could at best be shown as exceptional. Hong could not to the end of his life provide a credible connection between these two pivotal moments in his history of Korean science. Ultimately He could not question the received wisdom that science and technology were Western phenomena. But his scholarship became the departure point for later scholars of history of Korean science, who went on to perceive making that exact connection their central quest. It was the very contradiction within Hong’s scholarship that also provide problematic for his academic heirs. That Korea exhibited glimpses of modernist impulse but never fully became modern on its own, generated anxiety as the field of Korean history sought to promote the theory of Korea’s own modernization. The fruit of this argument was to overturn Hong Yi-sup’s one fundamental presupposition of Confucianism as a backward thought system.

목차

1. 서론
2. ‘전통’과 ‘근대성’의 딜레마
3. ‘유교’로부터 분리된 ‘과학’
4. ‘世宗’과 ‘實學’이라는 과학적 전통
5. 홍이섭 이후의 문제들: 결론을 대신하여

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-374-000557115