지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present study focuses on the recognition and evaluation of King Onjo, the founder of Baekje. This study differs from previous research in that it attempts to provide a chronological analysis rather than a mere exploration of the Foundation Myth and King Onjo’s achievements.
It seems that the Foundation Myth centering on King Onjo was solidified as the nation’s foundations were laid and Biryu(沸流) was consolidated. It is valid to assume that King Onjo is the rightful subject of the Foundation Myth because he was the king who established Baekje.
During the 46 years of King Onjo’s reign, a capital was designated and an imperial palace was built. In addition, the Five Bu System(5部制) was implemented ensuring local sovereignty. Although King Onjo was not able to rule the nation with a strong hand, he overcame the instability that plagued the nascent nation and forged the foundation for ruling an ancient state.
In 『Samguksagi(三國史記)』, it is recorded that the subject of the Foundation Myth is indeed King Onjo and that he was the one who established Baekje. This recognition was reinforced through historical records in the period of King Geunchogo(近肖古王) and this recognition was retained and passed on to subsequent generations. It is speculated that King Onjo was portrayed as a mystical King and nation founder with supernatural powers. However, after Baekje was destroyed by Silla(新羅), Silla reinterpreted the history of Baekje and recast the portrayal of King Onjo by omitting mention of his supernatural powers.
King Onjo, as described in 『Samguksagi』 Baekje-Bonki(百濟本紀), was not only skilled at hunting but also was described as having outstanding military prowess. According to Koryo Dynasty(高麗王朝) records which recorded the history of the Three Kingdoms, the history of Baekje is not dealt with much compared to Koguryu(高句麗) and Silla. Despite this neglect, King Onjo, as the founder of Baekje, has been highly evaluated.
In the Joseon Dynasty(朝鮮王朝), research regarding the history of Baekje was insubstantial. In the time of King Sejong(世宗) the burial ground of King Onjo was situated in Jigsan and in King Injo’s(仁祖) time, a memorial temple was erected at Namhansanseong(南漢山城) where rituals and ceremonies were held. However, a temple named Soongleul(崇烈) which finally paid proper respect to King Onjo was not constructed until late into the Three Kingdoms period during King Jeongjo’(正祖)s reign.
The Sirhak scholars(實學者) of the late Joseon Dynasty were interested in research concerning the Three Kingdoms period. However, research on the history of Baekje and the Three Kingdoms was not continuously carried out and various historical materials were destroyed in the wake of several wars. So it was inevitable that the Sirhak scholars were limited in their research of the history of Baekje.
It seems that the Foundation Myth centering on King Onjo was solidified as the nation’s foundations were laid and Biryu(沸流) was consolidated. It is valid to assume that King Onjo is the rightful subject of the Foundation Myth because he was the king who established Baekje.
During the 46 years of King Onjo’s reign, a capital was designated and an imperial palace was built. In addition, the Five Bu System(5部制) was implemented ensuring local sovereignty. Although King Onjo was not able to rule the nation with a strong hand, he overcame the instability that plagued the nascent nation and forged the foundation for ruling an ancient state.
In 『Samguksagi(三國史記)』, it is recorded that the subject of the Foundation Myth is indeed King Onjo and that he was the one who established Baekje. This recognition was reinforced through historical records in the period of King Geunchogo(近肖古王) and this recognition was retained and passed on to subsequent generations. It is speculated that King Onjo was portrayed as a mystical King and nation founder with supernatural powers. However, after Baekje was destroyed by Silla(新羅), Silla reinterpreted the history of Baekje and recast the portrayal of King Onjo by omitting mention of his supernatural powers.
King Onjo, as described in 『Samguksagi』 Baekje-Bonki(百濟本紀), was not only skilled at hunting but also was described as having outstanding military prowess. According to Koryo Dynasty(高麗王朝) records which recorded the history of the Three Kingdoms, the history of Baekje is not dealt with much compared to Koguryu(高句麗) and Silla. Despite this neglect, King Onjo, as the founder of Baekje, has been highly evaluated.
In the Joseon Dynasty(朝鮮王朝), research regarding the history of Baekje was insubstantial. In the time of King Sejong(世宗) the burial ground of King Onjo was situated in Jigsan and in King Injo’s(仁祖) time, a memorial temple was erected at Namhansanseong(南漢山城) where rituals and ceremonies were held. However, a temple named Soongleul(崇烈) which finally paid proper respect to King Onjo was not constructed until late into the Three Kingdoms period during King Jeongjo’(正祖)s reign.
The Sirhak scholars(實學者) of the late Joseon Dynasty were interested in research concerning the Three Kingdoms period. However, research on the history of Baekje and the Three Kingdoms was not continuously carried out and various historical materials were destroyed in the wake of several wars. So it was inevitable that the Sirhak scholars were limited in their research of the history of Baekje.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 건국설화의 형성과 온조왕
Ⅲ. 온조왕대의 통치 기반 구축
Ⅳ. 온조왕에 대한 인식과 평가
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
백제 建國神話의 형성과정과 그 의미
한국고대사연구
2005 .09
-
유물ㆍ유적을 통해 본 百濟建國說話
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2001 .09
-
『三國史記』 百濟本紀의 溫祚傳承과 沸流傳承
역사와 담론
2015 .01
-
한국 詠史樂府에 나타난 對百濟史 認識考
漢文古典硏究
2016 .01
-
백제 국가형성사 연구 동향과 과제
동북아역사논총
2018 .09
-
Two Sirhak Scholars’ Agricultural Reform Theories
Korea Journal
1974 .10
-
백제인의 미의식
역사학보
2006 .12
-
중국계 백제관료에 대한 고찰
史叢(사총)
2012 .01
-
백제 온조왕대 영역확장에 대한 재검토 : 비류집단 복속과 ‘마한’ 국읍 병합을 중심으로
한국사학보
2013 .02
-
조선 선조대 후반 忽剌溫 부잔타이[布占泰]의 침입 양상
역사와경계
2016 .09
-
溫突考
비교민속학
2000 .08
-
백제에 대하여
우리말글
2000 .12
-
실학자들의 역사지리관과 고조선 한사군 연구
한국고대사연구
2011 .06
-
Sirhak Thought and Its Reflection in Policies
Korea Journal
1974 .05
-
4~7세기 백제의 경계와 그 변화 -경기와 충청지역을 중심으로-
백제문화
2018 .01
-
5세기 百濟의 정국변동과 倭 5王의 작호
한국고대사연구
2010 .12
-
百濟 聖王代의 북방 영역 변화
한국사연구
2003 .03
-
Chapter 12 : Two Aspects of Practical Learning (實學 Sirhak) : The Case of Hong Tae-yong
Philosophy and Culture
2008 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-051-000537804