지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aims to consider argument of the following old thing(法古) and the making new thing(創新) that happened in the Ming(明) dynasty’s the former seven masters(前七子). Writer to study is Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽, 1472~1529) and Ha, kyung-myung(何景明, 148 3~1521) that is typical person.
The problem of the following old thing(法古) that Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) and Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) think is intelligible. The target of the following old thing(法古) that Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) thinks is underlying rule like ruler, is not following old mean(古意), old form(古形), old word(古辭). The ruler is rule of composition method such as heupbyeok (翕闢), donjwa(頓挫), cheokchon(尺寸), somil(疏密), hwalse(闊細), silheo(實虛). Moreover, is seeking an ideal style such as yudam(柔澹), hamchuk(含蓄), jeonhu(典厚), gogo(高古), wanliang(宛亮), chimchak(沈著). The target of the following old thing(法古) that Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) thinks is not immanent rule like ruler that Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) suggests, external rule such as writing force and novel expression.
The making new thing(創新)’s argument is different according to viewpoint which evaluate the value. If the making new thing(創新) that Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) insists is thing which creates a style of his own through the following old thing(法古), Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) emphasizes the making new thing(創新) that complete naturally through the following old thing(法古)’s observance. Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) clears the making new thing(創新)’s method as philosophy of evacuation, and Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) premises that do not obess over the making new thing(創新). Through method to keep the rule without being caved, Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) emphasizes the making new thing(創新) that the expression changes in a person naturally even if do not search conspicuousness. Moreover, when writer creates poetry and prose, Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) asserts the making new thing(創新) that describes the present matter by own emotion, he presents the following old thing(法古) that do not steal the expression with old rule.
The problem of the following old thing(法古) that Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) and Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) think is intelligible. The target of the following old thing(法古) that Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) thinks is underlying rule like ruler, is not following old mean(古意), old form(古形), old word(古辭). The ruler is rule of composition method such as heupbyeok (翕闢), donjwa(頓挫), cheokchon(尺寸), somil(疏密), hwalse(闊細), silheo(實虛). Moreover, is seeking an ideal style such as yudam(柔澹), hamchuk(含蓄), jeonhu(典厚), gogo(高古), wanliang(宛亮), chimchak(沈著). The target of the following old thing(法古) that Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) thinks is not immanent rule like ruler that Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) suggests, external rule such as writing force and novel expression.
The making new thing(創新)’s argument is different according to viewpoint which evaluate the value. If the making new thing(創新) that Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) insists is thing which creates a style of his own through the following old thing(法古), Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) emphasizes the making new thing(創新) that complete naturally through the following old thing(法古)’s observance. Ha, kyung-myung(何景明) clears the making new thing(創新)’s method as philosophy of evacuation, and Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) premises that do not obess over the making new thing(創新). Through method to keep the rule without being caved, Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) emphasizes the making new thing(創新) that the expression changes in a person naturally even if do not search conspicuousness. Moreover, when writer creates poetry and prose, Lee, mong-yang(李夢陽) asserts the making new thing(創新) that describes the present matter by own emotion, he presents the following old thing(法古) that do not steal the expression with old rule.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 내재적인 法古와 외재적인 法古
3. 목적론적 創新과 자연적인 創新
4. 後七子의 계승과 변화
5. 맺음말
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-820-000518362