메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박동근 (건국대학교)
저널정보
한국사전학회 한국사전학 한국사전학 제17호
발행연도
2011.4
수록면
106 - 143 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study to examine the situations of increase of the number of headwords that has been pointed out as a bad example of compilation of Korean dictionary, to review critically the concept of ‘ghost word’ and the adequacy issue of terminology associated with it, and to give some suggestions about ghost word treatment based on the critical review.
As a result, ‘ghost word’ that has been used so far is given some suggestion to use with distinction as follows. First, a word was actually used and was listed in the Korean dictionary, but it is not used now. It is called ‘obsolescence word’. Second, even if it’s listed in the Korean dictionary as a headword, it has never been used in Korean and came from an unknown source. It’s called ‘doggaebimal’. Third, a word that was listed in dictionary by typographical error or misunderstanding is called ‘ghost word’.
In order to prevent abuses of doggaebimal, doggaebimal should not be listed in the dictionary inherently. For this purpose, it’d be nice to point it out in vocabulary information, if a dictionary adds a new word that was not listed in the dictionary before.
In addition, it should be emphasized to study new word regularly as well as obsolescence word. Obsolescence word should not be excluded in the dictionary unilaterally. But at least it’s necessary to distinguish words currently being used from words not being used.

목차

1. 머리말
2. 유령어에 대한 앞선 인식들
3. 사전의 표제어 늘리기와 유령어
4. 유령어의 개념 정립과 국어사전에서의 처리 문제
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-703-000637960