개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The incumbent administration has been performing a number of regulation reforms throughout the whole national system, one of which was to reform land use regulations for enhancing the competitiveness and the territorial quality of our country. The study intended to assess the achievements and performance outcomes of the reform drive through examining the whole process and relevant petitions.
The Presidential Council on Nation Competitiveness has brought forth 136 out of about 1,300 tasks examined for the land use regulation reforms through 24 meetings since its launch. It has also made an attempt to improve the regulatory system by receiving 263 petitions related to land use regulations that were faced by business people, residents and other stakeholders. One achievements of its institutional reforms was to make better overall administrative procedure that was connected with land use controls; however, other institutional reforms such as revising relevant laws and rules was not properly accomplished in time due to difficulty in the legislation procedure and the problems inherent in the institutional system itself and so on.
In order to achieve higher national competitiveness and territorial quality, the land use regulation reforms should take short-term and mid and long-term perspectives into consideration. It is necessary to resolve simple petitions and reform the legal procedure in the short run; on the other hand, it is vital to make land use regulations pragmatic and rational in the long run. This research concentrated on the short-term performance assessment of the land use deregulations; the mid and long-term performance assessment, however, needs to be conducted in terms of social and economic effects through the regulation reforms.
The Presidential Council on Nation Competitiveness has brought forth 136 out of about 1,300 tasks examined for the land use regulation reforms through 24 meetings since its launch. It has also made an attempt to improve the regulatory system by receiving 263 petitions related to land use regulations that were faced by business people, residents and other stakeholders. One achievements of its institutional reforms was to make better overall administrative procedure that was connected with land use controls; however, other institutional reforms such as revising relevant laws and rules was not properly accomplished in time due to difficulty in the legislation procedure and the problems inherent in the institutional system itself and so on.
In order to achieve higher national competitiveness and territorial quality, the land use regulation reforms should take short-term and mid and long-term perspectives into consideration. It is necessary to resolve simple petitions and reform the legal procedure in the short run; on the other hand, it is vital to make land use regulations pragmatic and rational in the long run. This research concentrated on the short-term performance assessment of the land use deregulations; the mid and long-term performance assessment, however, needs to be conducted in terms of social and economic effects through the regulation reforms.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국경위 토지규제개선 실적 및 이행실태 분석
Ⅲ. 토지규제 관련 민원처리 실적 및 이행실태 분석
Ⅳ. 현정부의 토지규제개선 성과평가
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-359-004221235