지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
“Sanwoo", a company magazine published by the Korea Development Bank, illustrated that the memory of the colonial period mainly emphasized on industrial finances while trivializing other aspects of colonialism to justify the establishment of banks. Based on this, the mainstream memory of the colonial period romanticized the colonial period. However, during the political upheaval around the April 19th Revolution, reformers of the Korea Development Bank disclosed hidden pieces of information about the colonial period and stood against the mainstream memory. These remarks were chiefly about the roles of the bank and its employees which were covered up by mainstream thinkers. By revealing these, the reformers attempted to criticize the upper class and revolutionize the bank. The fact that these movements emerged intermittently shows that the employees weren't solidly integrated by the mainstream memories but merely remained “stitched up" at times.
The reformers pointed out familism and subordination to power as vestiges of the colonialism that needed to be gotten rid of. Including diplomaism that had been interiorized by the bankers since the colonial period, these 3 factors were maintained or strengthened ever after the liberation in the bank. Here comes up the question whether these factors can be solely attributed to the colonialization. These factors can be considered as survival means for people after the failure of group endeavor in the latter era of the Chosun Dynasty. When thinking about the vestiges of Japanese colonization, it's important to keep in mind that there was a basis or a “root" that enabled these vestiges to remain. Unless this “root" is eradicated, the vestiges will still remain.
The reformers pointed out familism and subordination to power as vestiges of the colonialism that needed to be gotten rid of. Including diplomaism that had been interiorized by the bankers since the colonial period, these 3 factors were maintained or strengthened ever after the liberation in the bank. Here comes up the question whether these factors can be solely attributed to the colonialization. These factors can be considered as survival means for people after the failure of group endeavor in the latter era of the Chosun Dynasty. When thinking about the vestiges of Japanese colonization, it's important to keep in mind that there was a basis or a “root" that enabled these vestiges to remain. Unless this “root" is eradicated, the vestiges will still remain.
목차
Ⅰ. 기억 행위와 집단
Ⅱ. 주류 기억과 망각
Ⅲ. 대항 기억과 식민 잔재
Ⅳ. 봉합과 탈식민
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-911-004174522