지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article aims to examine the concept of ‘the memory’. This concept appeared in the historiographical discourse because of the discord between the history and the memory, and between the official history and the unofficial history. It seems that the history has no authority over the memory. Especially, the reason why the discourse of the memory dominates in recent years is the increased interests in the study of “how was it really” of the Holocaust, which incites in its turn to study “how was it really memorized”. In Korea, ‘the purification of the past’ played the same role.
The full bloom of the discourse of the memory in the Les Lieux de memoire reflects not only the inherent relation between the history and the memory, but the fact that France lost the honor of the leading country of the History. It is thus necessary to establish the identity of France by means of the memory inspiring the honor of the nation. So, Les lieux de memoire is a national history of France. In the historiographical dimension, this collective book can be estimated as a return to the national history which was disfavored by the social history.
In fact, Les lieux de memoire are not the places of the memory but those of the history. For example, what we can hear in such a place of memory as Jean d’Arc is neither the sacred voice, nor the popular memory, but the history reconstructed through the critical examination of the source, that is the memory. Despite of the title, the book edited by Pierre Nora doesn’t give the predominance to the memory. It doesn’t insist that the memory is more pure and nearer to the fact than the history. The discourse that the memory is true is no other than a myth. The history can’t be replaced by the memory.
The full bloom of the discourse of the memory in the Les Lieux de memoire reflects not only the inherent relation between the history and the memory, but the fact that France lost the honor of the leading country of the History. It is thus necessary to establish the identity of France by means of the memory inspiring the honor of the nation. So, Les lieux de memoire is a national history of France. In the historiographical dimension, this collective book can be estimated as a return to the national history which was disfavored by the social history.
In fact, Les lieux de memoire are not the places of the memory but those of the history. For example, what we can hear in such a place of memory as Jean d’Arc is neither the sacred voice, nor the popular memory, but the history reconstructed through the critical examination of the source, that is the memory. Despite of the title, the book edited by Pierre Nora doesn’t give the predominance to the memory. It doesn’t insist that the memory is more pure and nearer to the fact than the history. The discourse that the memory is true is no other than a myth. The history can’t be replaced by the memory.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 역사와 기억의 대립
Ⅲ. 민족으로의 복귀
Ⅳ. 민족통합
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈Re?sume?〉
〈Summary〉
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Nancy Wood / 1994 / Memory’s Remains: Les lieux de mémoire / History and Memory (6) : 123 ~
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pierre Nora / 1995 / La nation sans nationalisme / Espace Temps 59 : 66 ~ 69
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인중 / 2010 / 민족주의의 개념 / 프랑스사 연구 (22) : 295 ~ 322
4. [단행본] - 김인중 / / 옮긴이 해제, I : 429 ~ 430
5. [단행본] - 김응종 / 2005 / 서양의 역사에는 초야권이 없다 / 푸른역사 : 22 ~ 26
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Pierre Nora / 1995 / La nation sans nationalisme / Espace Temps 59 : 66 ~ 69
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인중 / 2010 / 민족주의의 개념 / 프랑스사 연구 (22) : 295 ~ 322
4. [단행본] - 김인중 / / 옮긴이 해제, I : 429 ~ 430
5. [단행본] - 김응종 / 2005 / 서양의 역사에는 초야권이 없다 / 푸른역사 : 22 ~ 26
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-926-004177002