지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper will examine the negative poetic fiction in John Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn” by analyzing the theory of Jacques Lacan’s object a. This focuses on the fictional nature of an idealized object.
Keats longs for an idealized and perfect world without suffering, but he recognizes it is nothing but a fantasy and a fiction. He knows that nature is no longer construed as a mediator of the transcendental, but as a constant reminder of life’s mutability and mortality. This negative poetic fiction is Keats’s strategy to embrace tragedy through a series of negating images. It is used to disclose the fictional nature of an idealized object and the horror of a mundane reality.
In “Ode on a Grecian Urn”, Keats elevates the disused utensil, a grecian urn, to a sublime object of artistic worth. What is important here is that object a is not the object itself but functions as the thing masking what it lacks. An idealized urn conceals the truth that it is nothing but an urn possessing the remains of an agitated, changeable, and ultimately failed human being. Desiring subject constantly seeks something nearly impossible to obtain, the urn, but in the end fails to grasp it. This is because desire is always a desire for something missed.
In spite of this impossibility, fantasy can be a means of realizing a subject’s desire. Usually fantasy is considered a means to bring about a subject’s desire even if it is based on an illusion. A subject must realize that such a thing is merely fantasy because subjectification takes place only after the fact.
Keats longs for an idealized and perfect world without suffering, but he recognizes it is nothing but a fantasy and a fiction. He knows that nature is no longer construed as a mediator of the transcendental, but as a constant reminder of life’s mutability and mortality. This negative poetic fiction is Keats’s strategy to embrace tragedy through a series of negating images. It is used to disclose the fictional nature of an idealized object and the horror of a mundane reality.
In “Ode on a Grecian Urn”, Keats elevates the disused utensil, a grecian urn, to a sublime object of artistic worth. What is important here is that object a is not the object itself but functions as the thing masking what it lacks. An idealized urn conceals the truth that it is nothing but an urn possessing the remains of an agitated, changeable, and ultimately failed human being. Desiring subject constantly seeks something nearly impossible to obtain, the urn, but in the end fails to grasp it. This is because desire is always a desire for something missed.
In spite of this impossibility, fantasy can be a means of realizing a subject’s desire. Usually fantasy is considered a means to bring about a subject’s desire even if it is based on an illusion. A subject must realize that such a thing is merely fantasy because subjectification takes place only after the fact.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 대상에의 몰입, 감추어진 진실
Ⅲ. 대상의 실체, 사실은 미혹의 대상
Ⅲ. 나가며
Works Cited
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
존 키츠의 송시들 : 역설의 작용
윤명옥
새한영어영문학
2006
.02
존 키츠의 「그리스 항아리에 부치는 송시」("Ode on a Grecian Urn")에 나타난 부정적 시적 허구 전략
이은아
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2010
.10
Keats의 'Ode on a Grecian Urn'
양순덕
새한영어영문학
1985
.02
Ode on a Grecian Urn의 다시 읽기 : 그 신화에 대한 저항
이규명
신영어영문학
2000
.08
존 키츠의 시에 사용된 파라독스 : 감각과 영원의 공존
조전래
19세기 영어권 문학
2007
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-840-004311878