지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1866, the (Division of International Affairs at the Office of the Prime Minister (總理各國事務衙門) of the Qing Dynasty that controlled the foreign affairshad the proposal of Robert Hart of the Great Britain who was in charge of the marine customs affairs for the Qing Dynasty. In a non-official visit that would do away with the inconvenience of diplomatic protocol, a low ranking official, Binchun who was on grade 3 position at the Office of the Prime Minister, was selected to head a delegation to visit Europe to take a look at the Europe continent. The delegation included Binchun and three Dongmungwan (同文館) students who were in charge of interpretation. Their duties were to make detailed record on topographic situation, life habits and others for each country in Europe and visit several places in general as non-political visit. However, Robert Hart who recommended this visit intended for the Qing Dynasty and western countries to have the turning point to enter into the diplomatic relationship through this event. This view of naturalized Chinese, Robert Hart by opening up the Qing Dynasty government and the Qing Dynasty and promote the equal diplomatic relationship with foreign countries and people of different views had the difference in the way of thinking that the Europe travel essay in 《乘?筆記》, travel poem collection in 《海國勝遊草 Haegukseungyucho》 and 《天外歸帆草 Cheonoigwibeomcho》 that Binchun wrote have different assessments at home and abroad. The Qing Dynasty government did not want to facilitate the hasty diplomatic relationship with foreign countries then and it did not have much implication to the permit of the Europe visiting delegation that it treated the Europe travel essay with minimal attention. On the other hand, the naturalized Chineses from the West (including Hart and other foreign diplomats in Beijing) placed great implication for Binchun’s trip to Europe. However, since Binchun had the status of lowry ranking government official from Manchuria and he was deemed as a person not to be aggressive in modernization reform that the Europe related travel essays that he wrote gained negative assessment. At the almost same period, Japan was under the focus on the reform movement had the positive assessment on the Europe travel essay of Binchun, unlike those naturalized Chineses from the West. With Binchun’s visit to Europe, those naturalized Chineses of the Qing Dynasty from the West and Japan had the different assessment which requires a little bit more of careful look at what kind of implication would the travel journal of Europe by Binchun in 《乘?筆記》 have. This article is intended to analyze several assessment paradigms and the criticism shown on the travel of Binchun in Europe that has the historic implication of the foreign relationship of the Qing Dynasty under the point of view of multi-culture.
목차
1. 前言
2. 《乘?筆記》評述範式之吊詭現象
3. 兩種《乘?筆記》之‘他者的凝視’
4. 追溯《乘?筆記》書寫現場?圍
5. 結語
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『漂海錄』과『乘槎錄』에 나타난 山東 인식의 비교
南冥學硏究
2014 .01
-
宋代 筆記 硏究
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2015 .08
-
筆記小說槪論
중국어문논역총간
1998 .12
-
宋代 筆記와 晩明 小品 : 隨筆類 筆記를 중심으로
중어중문학
2006 .06
-
《閱微草堂筆記》에 나타난 ‘神道設敎觀’의 의미
중국어문논역총간
2000 .06
-
關於兩宋筆記資源開發利用的思考
중국어문학
2004 .01
-
주산군도 승사 사람들의 의례생활
도서문화
2005 .12
-
淸代 ‘靑樓筆記’의 양상과 그 사회문화적 배경에 관한 연구
중어중문학
2012 .04
-
중국 사탕 문화에 대한 小考 : 송대 필기와 시를 중심으로
중국문화연구
2011 .12
-
Methods of Criticism
Korea Journal
1980 .05
-
筆記小說中的唐代“商胡” : 『太平广記』硏究之一
계명사학
2002 .11
-
『오주연문장전산고』에 나타난 차기체 필기의 특징
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2010 .09
-
학생들의 수업필기에 중시를 돌린 소감
중국조선어문
2007 .11
-
취재과정에서 필기의 중요성을 론함
중국조선어문
2009 .01
-
古朝鮮의 遼西地域 진출과 土着社會의 動向
고조선단군학
2017 .06
-
文化の礎
역사와실학
2000 .01
-
中世 東北亞細亞史 研究, 李龍範 著, 4ㆍ6倍版 131面, 亞細亞文化社, 1976. 5
역사학보
1976 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-820-004311527