지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.12
- 수록면
- 13 - 220 (209page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aimed to develop an ameliorated assessment procedure to measure various risk and need factors of Korean juvenile probationers. Dislike the original assessment instrument, the measurement procedure to develop in this study attempted to cover more variables related to criminogenic needs besides risk factors, which might provide the helpful information for intervention strategies.
The intake assessment procedure was constructed into a structured interview form. The interview was proceeded by pretrained interviewers. Ahead of interview interviwers reviewed all the documented information of a probationer' criminal record(s) and the investigation reports of present criminal conduct(s). This structured interview form could be regarded as one of the actuarial risk and need assessment tools.
As participants of this study, 345 juvenile probationers from 5 probation offices were recruited with consent. The reason why more subjects could not be included was that time and resources were very limited for this type of data collection to perform depth interviews.
First numerous risk and need factors included in an interview form was collected based on various materials of risk assessment tools in western countries. And some of the variables came from previous domestic studies (Jin, 1999, 2002: Lee et al, 2005). Among these variables the most effective ones to assess interviees' risk and need factors were investigated by means of exploring the relations to criterion measures. The criterion measures were recidivism of juvenile probationers and their previous criminal record(s). The criminal record(s) was the number of convictions and recidivism was reconviction record(s) during probation. It was expected the risk factors might be closely related to recidivism record and needs of juvenile probationers might be related to chronic criminal conducts.
The data were first analyzed with applying chi-quares and analyses of variance. Based on the results of these anayses, logistic regression and regression analyses were additionally preformed to investigate the most efficient variables to predict recidivism and to postdict the number of previous convictions. As a result, 33 predictors were drawn. In order to look for an inner construct structure, factor analysis was then applied. Four domains were produced based on the result of factor analysis and the standardized subscale scores and score profiles for each individual were computed. The score profiles could be used for diagnostic purposes for selecting treatment programs or intervention strategies. Finally, a cutoff point for security consideration was investigated on a total score scale made of 33 dichotomously transformed variables. ROC and related statistical indices presented score of 14 might function well to differentiate a high-risk group from others.
The intake assessment procedure was constructed into a structured interview form. The interview was proceeded by pretrained interviewers. Ahead of interview interviwers reviewed all the documented information of a probationer' criminal record(s) and the investigation reports of present criminal conduct(s). This structured interview form could be regarded as one of the actuarial risk and need assessment tools.
As participants of this study, 345 juvenile probationers from 5 probation offices were recruited with consent. The reason why more subjects could not be included was that time and resources were very limited for this type of data collection to perform depth interviews.
First numerous risk and need factors included in an interview form was collected based on various materials of risk assessment tools in western countries. And some of the variables came from previous domestic studies (Jin, 1999, 2002: Lee et al, 2005). Among these variables the most effective ones to assess interviees' risk and need factors were investigated by means of exploring the relations to criterion measures. The criterion measures were recidivism of juvenile probationers and their previous criminal record(s). The criminal record(s) was the number of convictions and recidivism was reconviction record(s) during probation. It was expected the risk factors might be closely related to recidivism record and needs of juvenile probationers might be related to chronic criminal conducts.
The data were first analyzed with applying chi-quares and analyses of variance. Based on the results of these anayses, logistic regression and regression analyses were additionally preformed to investigate the most efficient variables to predict recidivism and to postdict the number of previous convictions. As a result, 33 predictors were drawn. In order to look for an inner construct structure, factor analysis was then applied. Four domains were produced based on the result of factor analysis and the standardized subscale scores and score profiles for each individual were computed. The score profiles could be used for diagnostic purposes for selecting treatment programs or intervention strategies. Finally, a cutoff point for security consideration was investigated on a total score scale made of 33 dichotomously transformed variables. ROC and related statistical indices presented score of 14 might function well to differentiate a high-risk group from others.
목차
국문요약
제1장 서론
제2장 소년범에 대한 분류평가제도
제3장 우리나라 소년보호관찰의 실시
제4장 연구방법
제5장 연구결과
제6장 소년대상자 분류평가표의 도출
제7장 결론 및 논의
참고문헌
부록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
성인보호관찰대상자에 대한 분류평가도구 개발에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2006 .12
-
소년범의 검사 결정전조사제도를 위한 위험성평가도구 개발연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2009 .12
-
재범방지를 위한 범죄자처우의 과학화에 관한 연구(Ⅰ) : 위험성평가도구 개발에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2010 .12
-
남자 청소년 폭력사범 재범 예측 요인 : 남자 폭력소년 보호관찰대상자 재범위험성 평가도구(MVJP-RRAR) 개발 연구
형사정책연구
2010 .09
-
소년보호관찰 집단의 이질적 문제행동 패턴을 예측하는 위험요인 검증
한국청소년연구
2018 .08
-
핀란드의 소년사법체계에 대한 고찰
비교형사법연구
2008 .01
-
소년원교육에서 보호소년의 변화요인 탐색에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2016 .12
-
공급사슬 위험평가 및 위험관리전략이 공급사슬 운영성과에 미치는 영향
Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management
2014 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003836177