지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2010.6
- 수록면
- 285 - 308 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The controversy over the authorship of Shakespeare continues as vital as ever in the twenty-first century, with more people interested in the question. In 2007 it reaches the pinnacle of popular as well as academic achievements: the establishment of the Shakespeare Authorship Coalition, the Declaration of Reasonable Doubt About the Identity of William Shakespeare, and the new MA programme Shakespeare Authorship Studies, the first of its kind in the world, at Brunel University. This trend is towards the declaration that the identity of Shakespeare should be accepted as a legitimate topic for instruction and research in academia.
This paper is takes an orthodox approach to the authorship question. Therefore it intends not to give an account of who are the various alternative candidates that have been put forward over the years, but of when and how the authorship debate was necessitated by the needs of a specific critical and theoretical circumstance.
The discussion is composed of five chapters. The first and the second give a survey of how people began to question whether or not Shakespeare wrote the works of Shakespeare, establishing their own theories as authorship doubters. The third is focused on the development of the authorship debate in the first decade of the twenty-first century: it has been influenced by the Shakespearean criticism of the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century; it has reached its zenith in 2009, celebrating the 400th anniversary of the first publication of Shakespeare’s Sonnets, the 400th anniversary of the King’s Men’s occupation of their Blackfriars Playhouse, and the 300th anniversary of the publication of the first formal biography of Shakespeare. The fourth exemplifies Hank Whittemore’s The Monument as an example of deciphering the codes implanted in the text through archival research. The fifth concludes the paradox is that the Shakespeare authorship question proves his greatness: Shakespeare is subject to scrutiny and speculation, because he is the best of the writers for all time.
This paper is takes an orthodox approach to the authorship question. Therefore it intends not to give an account of who are the various alternative candidates that have been put forward over the years, but of when and how the authorship debate was necessitated by the needs of a specific critical and theoretical circumstance.
The discussion is composed of five chapters. The first and the second give a survey of how people began to question whether or not Shakespeare wrote the works of Shakespeare, establishing their own theories as authorship doubters. The third is focused on the development of the authorship debate in the first decade of the twenty-first century: it has been influenced by the Shakespearean criticism of the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century; it has reached its zenith in 2009, celebrating the 400th anniversary of the first publication of Shakespeare’s Sonnets, the 400th anniversary of the King’s Men’s occupation of their Blackfriars Playhouse, and the 300th anniversary of the publication of the first formal biography of Shakespeare. The fourth exemplifies Hank Whittemore’s The Monument as an example of deciphering the codes implanted in the text through archival research. The fifth concludes the paradox is that the Shakespeare authorship question proves his greatness: Shakespeare is subject to scrutiny and speculation, because he is the best of the writers for all time.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Shakespeare In Korea
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
Colonial Shakespeares : Shakespeare in Korea, 1906-1945
Shakespeare Review
1997 .12
-
Shakespeare연구의 성과
비평문학
1990 .09
-
한국에서의 Shakespeare 연구 조사(Ⅱ)
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
Shakespeare in Japanese
Shakespeare Review
2002 .09
-
19세기 아동 문학 풍토와 램 남매의 『셰익스피어 이야기』각색 연구
Shakespeare Review
2017 .03
-
셰익스피어 부흥과 여성 관객의 역할—“셰익스피어 레이디스 클럽”
영어영문학21
2012 .01
-
민족시인의 형성 : 왕정복고기와 18세기 영국의 셰익스피어
Shakespeare Review
2015 .09
-
Shakespeare Sonnets의 현상과 실제
새한영어영문학
1988 .12
-
셰익스피어와 1990년대 이후 미국 대중문화 : 『윌 파워!』에서 『햄릿의 블랙베리』까지 자기계발서를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2013 .03
-
18세기 셰익스피어 : 영국 국가영웅 이미지
Shakespeare Review
2007 .03
-
Shakespeare극중 초자연적 요소의 고찰
비평문학
1991 .10
-
On Teaching Shakespeare
Shakespeare Review
2016 .09
-
<위대한 비밀>로 재구성된 셰익스피어 저자론
Shakespeare Review
2013 .09
-
Everybody's Shakespeare
Shakespeare Review
1998 .06
-
“O brave new world”: 셰익스피어의 현대적 수용과 대중문화
고전 르네상스 영문학
2014 .01
-
Computer에 의한 Shakespeare연구와 국제협력
Shakespeare Review
1972 .04
-
Shakespeare Translation in Korea
Shakespeare Review
1975 .04
-
셰익스피어의 극과 음악
새한영어영문학
2012 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
18세기 셰익스피어 : 영국 국가영웅 이미지
한영림
Shakespeare Review
2007
.03
『코리올레이너스』: 셰익스피어의 비극에 나타난 정치성
강희정
Shakespeare Review
2008
.12
17, 18세기 정치 풍토 속 『리어 왕』 재현 양상에 대한 연구 : 테이트의 『리어 왕』과 배리의 그림을 중심으로 한 고찰
권오숙
Shakespeare Review
2010
.03
넘치는 셰익스피어, 여전히 부족한 셰익스피어 -윌리엄 셰익스피어 지음, 『셰익스피어 로맨스 희곡 전집』, 이상섭 옮김(문학과지성사, 2008)
김태원
문학과사회
2009
.02
소포클레스의 오이디푸스와 프로이트의 오이디푸스
이성원
서양고전학연구
2016
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-840-003888618