메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법무정책연구원 형사정책연구 형사정책연구 통권 제49호
발행연도
2002.3
수록면
35 - 66 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study empirically tested the general propositions of self-control theory (Gottfredson and Hirschi, 1990), using a data set of Korean girl sample. Specifically, self-control is operationalized by combining both attitudinal items and behavioral ones and tested using criteria of reliability and validity. Following tests mainly focus on generality of self-control theory. The measure of self-control is related to four different types of crime and delinquency. Age effect, independent from self-control, on crime is also tested.
Overall, the test results support the claims of self-control theory. Findings from the validity tests of the self-control index show theoretically expected relations with gender and delinquent status. Test results show that girls low on self-control are more likely than others to have committed four different types of crime and delinquency. Research findings show that school girls tend to commit more status delinquency as they grow older in their teens; however, age effect was not found in crime mainly due to small variance of crime in school girl subsample.
Comparative analysis between attitudinal measure and behavioral one of self-control was also conducted. Behavioral measure of self-control has an edge on attitudinal one because it has greater variance in the light of the fact that actions speak louder than words. At the same time, researcher needs to be attentive when he/she chooses items for behavioral measure of self-control in order not to meet possible problem of tautology. Research findings show that officially delinquent juveniles under custody are more likely to have the social desirability of answers and that behavioral measure of self-control is less likely to be biased by the total institution. Further research implications are also discussed.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 자료, 변수와 분석방법
Ⅳ. 분석결과 및 논의
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
〈부록〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-364-003957573