메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

The Critical Analysis of the Reflection in Action as a Method of Pre-service Teacher Education
Recommendations
Search
Questions

예비교사교육 방법으로서 '행위 중 반성'에 대한 비판적 고찰

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Sunmee Park (인하대학교)
Journal
Korean Social Studies Association Social Studies Education Vol.49 No.3 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2010.9
Pages
39 - 52 (14page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
The Critical Analysis of the Reflection in Action as a Method of Pre-service Teacher Education
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
This paper aims to investigate theoretically the relevance of the reflection in action as a method of acquiring practical knowledge to be used as a pre-service teacher education program. For this, the paper first introduces the meaning of reflection in action argued by Donald. A. Schon, analyzes Schon’s argument by using Wittgenstein’s notion of private language, explores feasibility of immediateness of thinking and acting, and evaluates the possibility of applying Schon’s concept of reflection in action into pre-service teacher education. As a result, the paper finds (1) the private emotions and sense such as feelings, sense, and nuance that we have during the process of reflection in action do not have language delivery function in terms of epistemology, so they are difficult to teach. (2) the feasibility of Schon’s concept of reflection in action is seriously limited due to its immediateness and situation context. (3) the actual college level program for pre-service teacher education based on the concept of reflection in action focuses on reflection on action not on reflection in action, and treats reflection as a sort of skill that we have to acquire. This is not because they fail to develop a sophisticated program for reflection in action, but because reflection in action itself has some fundamental limitations in terms of epistemology.

Contents

요약
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 실천적 지식 개발 방법으로서 행위 중 반성
Ⅲ. ‘행위 중 반성’ 능력의 교수 가능성
Ⅳ. ‘행위 중 반성’의 즉시성이 갖는 실천적 한계
Ⅴ. 반성적 교사 교육 프로그램에 내재된 ‘반성’의 의미
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

References (54)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-374-003597477