지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions are different from personal reflexives and passive constructions in some morpho-syntactic features. Above all, the Patient in these impersonal constructions has the oblique case, while the Patient in the passive and personal reflexive is promoted and obtains the nominative case. In addition, the Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions do not allow the auxiliary verbs and the oblique case denoting the Agent. Therefore, they are classified as an active construction, which do not have grammatical subject, but imply indefinite agents.
However, in these constructions the predicate is on the foreground and the Agent is on the background. The backgrounding of the Agent is one of the most important semantic features of the passive construction. Therefore from a semantic point of view these constructions can be classified as a passive construction.
The Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions can be called as pseudo-ergative constructions, where the Patient is not marked morphologically. From the viewpoint of lexical ergativity, the Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to predicates can be derived from the unaccusative and unergative predicates.
The Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions came from old Polish passive constructions. In their transformation into the active construction, only the Patient obtained the oblique case, but its predicate remains similar to the passive predicate and the meaning of covert indefinite agent is added to the predicate itself. The impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions of the other Balto-Slavic languages, like Ukraine, North Russian dialect and Lithuanian, are in different stages of evolution to active construction. Therefore, the Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions are the product of evolution, rather than the result of Sprachbund or the influence of Uralic languages.
However, in these constructions the predicate is on the foreground and the Agent is on the background. The backgrounding of the Agent is one of the most important semantic features of the passive construction. Therefore from a semantic point of view these constructions can be classified as a passive construction.
The Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions can be called as pseudo-ergative constructions, where the Patient is not marked morphologically. From the viewpoint of lexical ergativity, the Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to predicates can be derived from the unaccusative and unergative predicates.
The Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions came from old Polish passive constructions. In their transformation into the active construction, only the Patient obtained the oblique case, but its predicate remains similar to the passive predicate and the meaning of covert indefinite agent is added to the predicate itself. The impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions of the other Balto-Slavic languages, like Ukraine, North Russian dialect and Lithuanian, are in different stages of evolution to active construction. Therefore, the Polish impersonal reflexives and ?no/to constructions are the product of evolution, rather than the result of Sprachbund or the influence of Uralic languages.
목차
Ⅰ. 폴란드어 무주어 재귀 구문과 -no/-to 구문
Ⅱ. 폴란드어 무주어 재귀 구문과 -no/-to 구문의 수동성
Ⅲ. 폴란드어 무주어재귀구문과 -no/-to구문의 능격성 (Ergativity)
Ⅳ. 차용인가, 진화인가
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (18)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 고광주 / 2001 / 국어의 능격성 연구 / 월인
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cori Anderson / 2009 / Oblique Passivization: Evidence from Lithuanian and Slavic / 슬라브어 연구 14 (1) : 137 ~ 154
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bavant, Marc / 2008 / Proto-Indo-European ergativity…Still to be discussed / Poznań studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44 (4) : 433 ~ 447
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Blevins, James P / 2003 / Passives and impersonals / Journal of Linguistics (39) : 473 ~ 520
7. [단행본] - Comrie, Bernard / 1978 / Syntactic Typology:Studies in the phenomenology of Language / University of Texas Press : 329 ~ 394
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Cori Anderson / 2009 / Oblique Passivization: Evidence from Lithuanian and Slavic / 슬라브어 연구 14 (1) : 137 ~ 154
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Bavant, Marc / 2008 / Proto-Indo-European ergativity…Still to be discussed / Poznań studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44 (4) : 433 ~ 447
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Blevins, James P / 2003 / Passives and impersonals / Journal of Linguistics (39) : 473 ~ 520
7. [단행본] - Comrie, Bernard / 1978 / Syntactic Typology:Studies in the phenomenology of Language / University of Texas Press : 329 ~ 394
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사건 피동구문으로서의 러시아어 역경 비인칭 구문
슬라브학보
2011 .12
-
On Reflexive Movement
언어
1992 .06
-
Reflexivity and Reflexive Predicates in Korean
언어
2013 .12
-
Reflexive Constructions in English
생성문법연구
2003 .01
-
고대영어의 물주구문에서 주어구문으로의 변화에 대한 국면분석
언어과학연구
2017 .12
-
Passives and Impersonal Verb Constructions in the History of English
생성문법연구
2008 .01
-
Anaphoric Expressions in Telugu
언어학 연구
2015 .01
-
엘리자베스 비숍의 시: “치환의 기술”은 “하나의 예술”
현대영미시연구
2016 .01
-
러시아어 재귀표현에 대한 유형론적 고찰
노어노문학
2007 .08
-
Reflexive Verbs in Russian and Polish and the Nature of the Lexicon
동유럽발칸연구
2012 .01
-
A New Phase-based Analysis of English Reflexives
언어과학
2011 .01
-
허사(dummy pronoun) It의 통시적 고찰
영어영문학연구
2002 .01
-
A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN IMPERSONAL SENTENCES
어학연구
1985 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-309-003636216