지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the question about the necessity of collective violence and the inevitability of individual sacrifice in the process of historical revolution.
『Mauser』 is a judicial case in which a discussion is held between the collective chorus as the role of judge and the protagonist Mauser A as a convict. This drama begins with a pronouncement by the chorus on the accused A who worked as a executioner by the order of chorus and ends with his own execution. The span of the intervening time can be understood as a space of the personal experience and cognition of Mauser A. He begins his work with the elimination of his predecessor B. Therefore A and B are the only members of the chain of executioners-victims. A makes the mistake of murdering instead of killing. Finally he found that his victims are more than animals and matter, and begins to see them as human beings. That is why he becomes doubtful about the meaning of revolution.
There is the fault of A in that he tries to throw off the load of (pre)history through murdering, and the fault of the chorus lies in that the chorus wants to clear up the bloody trace of history with the execution of Mauser A. The chorus requires A to agree with his own execution. He refuses at first, but at last gives the command to fire. This contradictory death of A contains not only a protest which culminates in the question, who could take whom to court in this drama, but also the unanswered question whether the sacrifice of the individual by the violence of the collective is inevitable in the process of history. Heiner Muller gives indirect answers to this question as he emphasizes the individual life as the absolute. This is the basis of his humanism
Heiner Muller gives a new meaning to violence and death according to his aesthetic principle of effect. Protagonists experience fear through violence, and this fear forces them to find the reason and the solution. In this way fear and violence become a productive function for the new beginning. As with fear and violence, death becomes the meanning of somethig constructive, because they are in the literature Mullers metaphor for the creative Strength which destroys some of the old and brings as a result of that some of the new. Therefore 『Mauser』 belongs to a production drama of cruel dialectic. At the same time it is also a educational play about the dialectic of enlightment, because 『Mauser』 as a sketch of history criticizes the political situation of DDR (German Democratic Republic) at that time and gives a corrct reflection on the hisorical process.
『Mauser』 is a judicial case in which a discussion is held between the collective chorus as the role of judge and the protagonist Mauser A as a convict. This drama begins with a pronouncement by the chorus on the accused A who worked as a executioner by the order of chorus and ends with his own execution. The span of the intervening time can be understood as a space of the personal experience and cognition of Mauser A. He begins his work with the elimination of his predecessor B. Therefore A and B are the only members of the chain of executioners-victims. A makes the mistake of murdering instead of killing. Finally he found that his victims are more than animals and matter, and begins to see them as human beings. That is why he becomes doubtful about the meaning of revolution.
There is the fault of A in that he tries to throw off the load of (pre)history through murdering, and the fault of the chorus lies in that the chorus wants to clear up the bloody trace of history with the execution of Mauser A. The chorus requires A to agree with his own execution. He refuses at first, but at last gives the command to fire. This contradictory death of A contains not only a protest which culminates in the question, who could take whom to court in this drama, but also the unanswered question whether the sacrifice of the individual by the violence of the collective is inevitable in the process of history. Heiner Muller gives indirect answers to this question as he emphasizes the individual life as the absolute. This is the basis of his humanism
Heiner Muller gives a new meaning to violence and death according to his aesthetic principle of effect. Protagonists experience fear through violence, and this fear forces them to find the reason and the solution. In this way fear and violence become a productive function for the new beginning. As with fear and violence, death becomes the meanning of somethig constructive, because they are in the literature Mullers metaphor for the creative Strength which destroys some of the old and brings as a result of that some of the new. Therefore 『Mauser』 belongs to a production drama of cruel dialectic. At the same time it is also a educational play about the dialectic of enlightment, because 『Mauser』 as a sketch of history criticizes the political situation of DDR (German Democratic Republic) at that time and gives a corrct reflection on the hisorical process.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 작품의 줄거리와 구성적 특징
Ⅲ. 혁명에 대한 집단과 개체의 의미
Ⅳ. 사형선고와 처형사이-체험을 통한 새 인식의 형성과정
Ⅴ. “혁명의 적들에게 죽음을“ - 폭력과 죽음의 생산적 의미
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
셰익스피어 극에서 본 코러스의 기능과 역할 : 〈페리클레스〉와 〈헨리 5세〉를 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2001 .03
-
코러스의 극적 기능 : 『헨리 5세』의 경우
Shakespeare Review
2009 .03
-
법의 폭력, 법 너머의 폭력
인문논총
2012 .01
-
폭력의 내재성과 불가피성: 쑤퉁의《米》읽기
중국소설논총
2014 .01
-
폭력의 기원: 르네 지라르의 희생양과 조르조 아감벤의 호모 사케르
새한영어영문학
2010 .08
-
생활세계와 미시적 폭력의 양상 : 이동하론
비평문학
2008 .08
-
노랫소리운동에 관한 일고찰 : ‘국민개창운동’과 ‘노랫소리운동’, 그리고 대중의 수용을 중심으로
일본연구
2014 .02
-
성폭력의 실태와 대책을 위한 연구
대학과 복음
2004 .12
-
폭력과 저항의 탈근대적 논의와 기독교 평화주의
신학논단
2014 .12
-
｢月英娘子傳｣에 나타난 暴力性의 樣相과 意味
어문연구(語文硏究)
2018 .01
-
하이너 뮐러의 역사철학과 연극미학
외국문학연구
1997 .12
-
여성 성폭력과 기독교 자원의 순기능을 위한 연구
신학과 목회
2013 .11
-
"Creative Mistranslation?": Adaptation as Violence
영미문학페미니즘
2001 .01
-
국가와 폭력 -국가가 실패하는 순간에 대한 고찰
역사비평
2020 .05
-
중세 말 프랑스 국가발생과 폭력의 역사 : 필리프 4세와 필리프 5세 시기를 중심으로
역사와 세계
2014 .12
-
전쟁과 사회: 드포의 몰 플랜더즈와 예이츠의 ｢내전기의 사색｣
한국 예이츠 저널
2019 .01
-
Beyond Gender Violence : Examining of Violence Against Women from a Christian Social Ethical Perspective
Theology and The World
2011 .09
-
데리다의 삶과 철학의 재조명 : 폭력론을 중심으로
인문과학
2011 .12
-
Understanding the Fear of Death and Implications for Christian Education
Journal of Christian Education & Information Technology
2016 .10
-
폭력 개념에 대한 고찰 : 갈퉁, 벤야민, 아렌트, 지젝을 중심으로
역사비평
2014 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-705-003655146